New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Strangely Shaped Bubbles Tell the Story of Ice’s Formation and Composition

Bubbles shaped like teardrops, flattened eggs and worms reveal ice’s inner life

Image of ice bubbles beneath a body of water, with a cliff in the background with a sunset

Anton Petrus/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Look closely at an ice cube, and you might spot minuscule bubbles shaped like teardrops, flattened eggs or even winding worms. Bubble patterns in Russia’s Lake Baikal (shown here) are even more vivid. Researchers have found that ice bubbles’ peculiar shapes can reveal how fast the water froze and how much gas was dissolved in it, providing key insights for glaciologists and engineers.

As water freezes, most of its dissolved gases get expelled. But some tiny bubbles near the freezing edge can get trapped in the solidifying ice, where they keep growing. Virgile Thiévenaz, who studies fluid mechanics at Paris’s Industrial Physics and Chemistry Higher Education Institute, and Alban Sauret, a mechanical engineer at the University of California, Santa Barbara, re-created this process in the laboratory to tease apart the factors that affect growing bubbles’ shapes and sizes.

As Thiévenaz explained during a presentation at an American Physical Society meeting, the researchers observed that ice bubbles are never spherical but instead elongate in the direction of freezing. The researchers found that an ice sample hosting many small, slightly elongated bubbles suggests a high freezing rate and a high gas concentration, whereas a sample with a few larger, longer pores froze more slowly. These variations are predictable mathematically: “We can match most bubbles with the same equation,” Thiévenaz says. If you know a sample’s freezing rate, you can work out the gas concentration, and vice versa. Their equation predicts that long, cylindrical ice-bubble “worms” will sometimes grow unchecked, weakening the surrounding structure.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Environmental ice tells a story about the past, but determining past freezing conditions is tricky. Thiévenaz and Sauret say that making inferences based on bubble shape could be a boon for researchers studying lake ice and glacier cores. Erin Pettit, a glaciologist at Oregon State University, agrees. “I’ve always been puzzled by the wormy bubbles in pockets of refreezing water within glaciers,” she says. “It’s exciting to see the physics behind their formation.”

Additionally, many engineers favor porous solids for certain applications because of their light weight. By controlling gas concentration and freezing speed, scientists could theoretically dictate a material’s pore shape, leading to strong and light metals, glasses and ceramics, the researchers suggest.

Rachel Berkowitz is a freelance science writer and a corresponding editor for Physics Magazine. She is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eastsound, Wash.

More by Rachel Berkowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Icy Secrets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 6 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062024-5aKqVOicsv8XH3p1BsRn5R

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe