New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Study Finds Smoking in Movies Tied to Adolescent Tobacco Use

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

According to a new study, when it comes to smoking, adolescents may be emulating the movie stars they see on the big screen. Writing in the December 15 issue of the British Medical Journal, researchers at Dartmouth College report that they have found a link between tobacco use in movies and smoking amongst young people.

James D. Sargent and colleagues questioned 4,919 New England middle school students between the ages of nine and 15 about their smoking habits and movies they had seen. "For better or worse, adolescents watch a lot of movies," Sargent explains. "So many that they might see more smoking in films than in the real world."

The researchers counted cigarette smoking activity in 601 popular films released in the United States between 1988 and 1999. The questionnaires asked students to identify movies they watched from a list of 50 randomly selected titles, ranging from The Addams Family to The X-Files. The team then compared the students' exposure to smoking in films to their personal smoking history. Students with the highest exposure to movie smoking, the study found, were more than two and a half times as likely to take up smoking compared to those with the least exposure when other influential factors such as peer smoking, smoking by parents, school performance and rebelliousness were considered. "With this survey, we've shown that what teens see in the movies is statistically linked with what they do," Sargent notes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors caution, however, that their findings are limited by the study design, which cannot determine the temporal sequence of events¿that is, whether seeing tobacco in films precedes smoking. "The results," they conclude, "are the first step towards determining causation."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe