New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

‘SuperLab’ Will Test U.S. Power Grid against Climate Disasters

The Department of Energy is launching an initiative to mimic climate disasters and other threats against the power grid

Damaged utility poles against sunset

Damaged utility poles after Hurricane Delta made landfall in Louisiana, U.S.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | The Energy Department is creating a "SuperLab" to test the electric grid by using simulated climate disasters.

The initiative, to be launched next year, will include seven DOE laboratories. It will mimic catastrophes such as a cyberattack aimed at causing shock and chaos in a critical area or a blackout caused by a hurricane or large Western wildfire that topples power lines.

Some of the groundwork has already been created, including previous SuperLabs and a recent research platform that can share information by technical staff from the seven far-flung labs as if they were one.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One goal is to determine how to move the right mix of available clean electricity and stored power from batteries, hydrogen and hydroelectric systems to the right places.

An equivalent effort in the Pentagon would likely be called a war game. The goal of the energy exercise, as one DOE official described it, is to ensure “everyone brings their best game and we all work together.”

That hasn’t always happened. In 2017, according to a recent DOE report, the first SuperLab was too slow and suffered from “varying latency.” For another one held in 2021, the ambition was small: It focused on rapidly fixing the power problems of a small Alaskan city.

One held in January involved only two DOE labs, used a lot of simulation and lasted only an hour.

The SuperLab planned for late 2024 will be much larger.

“We’ll unlock the full potential of our national laboratories,” said Rob Hovsapian, an engineer and research lead at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

The exercise is designed to help scientists explore the capabilities and the gaps in the emerging clean energy systems, including the potential danger from natural and human-made threats. It will deal with “a large problem of national interest that no one lab could handle by themselves,” Hovsapian explained in an interview.

Hovsapian, mechanical engineer who spent the first 20 years of his career working for defense-related companies and later for the Office of Naval Research, said experts in the military and industry had begun to realize that dealing with climate change will create some new vulnerabilities.

Pulling away from gasoline and diesel fuel, for example, could eventually lead to cities with large fleets of electric vehicles that may have no place to recharge in a lengthy blackout.

“This is an international problem,” Hovsapian said, adding that the availability of wind and solar power is often far from where it's needed in crowded cities, raising the prospect that increasingly larger storms could knock out newly built distribution lines.

Hovsapian noted that U.S. cities can currently withstand long winter storms by generating heat and electricity from large fossil fuel power plants, but there will be a need to replace them with utility-scale storage facilities that are able to hold renewable energy and nuclear power.

As Hovsapian put it, the new power systems will require protections, including from cyberattacks.

“Every day, you’re coming into work knowing you are anticipating new problems that are going to happen in the future, even though it’s sometimes difficult to articulate," he said. "But it’s important to create new tools and the next generation of scientists.”

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe