Support for the Stick

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists connected with a 2001 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPC) found in an analysis of Northern Hemisphere temperatures over the past millennium, a sharp rise starting around 1900. Their “hockey stick” graph and conclusion that human activity caused this sudden warming drew fire from politicians and critics. The National Research Council now lends support to the hockey stick. It finds that tree rings, ice cores and other evidence suggest with a high level of confidence that the last decades of the 20th century were warmer than any comparable span in the past four centuries. And like the IPC work, its report, released June 22, expressed less certainty in temperature reconstructions going back a millennium because of the scarcity of precisely dated evidence before the 17th century. The council noted that the available data did suggest that many locations were hotter in the past 25 years than during any other quar ter-century period since the 10th century.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Support for the Stick” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 3 (), p. 38
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0906-38b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe