Suspension Bridge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have received, says the Montreal Herald, a copy of a report on a Railway Suspension Biidge over the River St. Lawrence, near Quebec, made for the City Council, by order of N F. Belleau, E q , Mayr of Quebec, by William Serrell, Civil Engineer.— The report reflects the highest credit on Mr. Serrell. It has been most carefully prepared. Three sites for the proposed bridge wt-re surveyed—one near the river Chaudiere, about four miles from the mouth of Cape Rouue Creek, another from Durham Terrace to Point Levy, and a third from a lew hundred yards above Cape Diamond to the opposite shore. The result of which surveys or examinations is, that Mr. Serrel) sees the entire practicability of a bridge for railway and other travel, and that too, within the means at your (the City Councils-) command. The site se ect-ed near the Chaudiere will require a bridge of three thousand four hundred feet. The plan proposed is a wire uspension bridge, consisting of two massive towers of masonry, built in the river in twelve feet deep of water at average low tide; these towers to be in total height from their base about 330 feet, and 52 by 137 feet square at the base, battering regularly upwards; and they will be 1.6fO feet apart at their centre. The height ot the roadway above high water is to be 162 feet; the roadway will consist of two carriage ways, each ten and a half feet wide in the clear, and a railway track of such width or gauge as to match tne railways which may connect with it; the entire width of the road being 32 feet in the clear inside the parapet.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 25This article was published with the title “Suspension Bridge” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 25 (), p. 195
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03051853-195b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe