Swallows May Be Evolving to Dodge Traffic

Road-kill numbers of roadside-nesting cliff swallows have dropped as birds shorten their wings to become more agile

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Roadside-nesting cliff swallows have evolved shorter, more maneuverable wings, which may have helped them to make hasty retreats from oncoming vehicles, according to a study published in Current Biology.

The study’s authors discovered the trend after noticing that the number of vehicle-killed birds had declined over the past three decades. They suggest that the two findings provide evidence of roadway-related adaptation.

“I’m not saying that it’s all because of wing length,” says Charles Brown, a biologist at the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma and one of the authors of the study. But, he says, the shortening does support the idea that the birds are adapting to disturbed environments, as other organisms presumably are.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Together with Mary Bomberger Brown, a ornithologist at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Brown tracked roadside populations of cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) in western Nebraska for 30 years, mostly to study the birds social behaviors within their colonies.

These birds winter in South America but breed in North America, in colonies of up to 12,000 adults. They typically build their conical, mud-based nests into the sides of cliffs, but have also taken to living under bridges and highway overpasses.

As the two researchers checked the roadside colonies, Brown, an amateur taxidermist, collected dead swallows for skinning and stuffing — gathering 104 vehicle-killed adults and 134 adults killed accidentally in nets used for the study. When he and Bomberger Brown noticed a decline in the annual number of roadkills — even though the overall population was increasing — they compared the wing measurements of both types of stuffed bird.

The team discovered that vehicle-killed birds had longer wings than birds that died in nets, and that while the wings of the vehicle-killed birds had lengthened over time, those of net-killed birds — which represented the general population — had shortened.

Escape strategy
Brown says that there is evidence that shorter wings make the animals more agile: “they can make a 90º turn more rapidly”, he says. That would help the birds to dodge traffic as they exit or enter their nesting sites, or take off from the pavement, Brown explains. And that in turn would enable them to survive and produce more short-winged offspring.

The researchers tried to rule out other factors that might have explained the decline in roadkill — including changes in methods to find the animals, traffic patterns, predators, diseases and scavengers — but acknowledge that it might have been caused by behavioral changes, such as the birds learning to avoid cars.

Taxidermist Johannes Erritzoe at the House of Birdresearch in Christiansfeld, Denmark, has also noticed a decline in the number vehicle-killed birds around Denmark, and suspects natural selection. Although he has not yet measured wing length, he says that he now plans to do so.

It is hard to definitely prove that animals are adapting to living around roads, says behavioral ecologist Colleen St. Clair at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. But, she says “this is the best demonstration that they do have that capacity”.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on March 18, 2013.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe