New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

T. rex Not Fleet of Foot, Study Shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: LUIS REY

It was big and it was mean, but Tyrannosaurus rex wasn't fast. In fact, the dinosaur we most love to hate may not have even been able to run at all. So say researchers writing in the current issue of the journal Nature. Contrary to previous suggestions that the beast could reach running speeds of up to 45 miles per hour (mph), the new findings indicate that such swiftness would have been biomechanically unfeasible.

To test the idea that T.rex could move quickly, Stanford University postdoctoral researcher John Hutchinson and engineer Mariano Garcia of Borg-Warner Automotive created a computer model capable of estimating the amount of leg muscle a given animal needs to run fast. After verifying the model's accuracy using living chickens and alligators, the investigators plugged in the parameters for T. rex. They found that in order for the beast to run 45 mph, it would have needed supportive muscles in each leg amounting to nearly 43 percent of its body weight. "That is ridiculous," Hutchinson declares, "because it would leave very little room for anything else in the body--a skeleton, other muscles, et cetera!"


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings shouldn't necessarily come as a surprise. "When you get down to the science of how animals move, relatively speaking, big things really don't move fast," Hutchinson points out. Further illustration of this point comes from the team's work on chickens, which are not only good runners but also one of the descendants of dinosaurs. Using the computer model to scale a chicken up to the size of T. rex (that's a 13,228-pound chicken), Hutchinson and Garcia showed that such an animal would require about 99 percent of its body mass in each leg as muscle in order to sprint. "That's far more than is possible," Hutchinson observes. "A giant chicken could not even walk."

Exactly how fast T. rex could move remains unknown, but the team proposes that roughly 11 mph--the pace of a leisurely stroll for these behemoths--might be a more reasonable estimate. In any event, even a ponderous T. rex could still hunt: body size would have likewise limited the ability of its large potential prey animals--duckbill dinosaurs and Triceratops among them--to flee.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe