New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Tadpoles Turn to Cannibalism Only When Desperate

Tadpoles ate tadpole meat to avoid starving but otherwise chose other food sources

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Updated Mon. Feb. 24 at 9:20 a.m. ET.  

Though seemingly docile creatures, tadpoles can get snippy when hungry, and sometimes end up eating each other when the stakes are high. Now, new research suggests that the tiny creatures are not ruthless cannibals, but rather only eat their pond-mates when resources are scarce. Otherwise, they avoid this actually nutritious option.

Many species of frogs, salamanders and other amphibians demonstrate some degree of cannibalism, particularly when resources are scarce. Still, whether the animals prefer this dietary option or rely on it only as a last resort remains unclear in some cases.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers based at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada wondered whether cannibalism was the most nutritious dietary option for tadpoles — common throughout northern North America. This would make sense because, theoretically, the meat of one's own species should contain vitamins and nutrients in quantities well suited for an individual's physiology.

"Any species that is the same as your own would theoretically be an ideal diet because they are going to contain all of the nutrients that you require for growth and development, in supposedly the correct proportions," study co-author Dale Jefferson told Live Science. "You can basically get everything you need from one source."

To determine whether tadpoles preferentially eat tadpole meat over other food sources, the team conducted a series of feeding experiments in which they offered the animals different combinations of frozen brine shrimp meat, cornmeal, tadpole meat or no food at all. In the wild, tadpoles may choose to eat algae or other smaller aquatic animals when not feeding on each other. [40 Freaky Frog Photos]

The team found that tadpoles consumed tadpole meat under conditions of starvation, and when competition for food was high due to the presence of other tadpoles, but that otherwise the animals chose alternative food sources. They preferred brine shrimp over cornmeal, likely for the shrimp's protein content, and tended to grow and develop faster when fed brine shrimp versus tadpole meat. The tadpole meat was only beneficial for growth and development compared to low-quality diets.

There are some inherent downsides to cannibalism as well, the team notes. For example, members of the same species can retaliate against each other and injure their aggressors, whereas algae or other smaller aquatic organisms cannot put up a fight. Also, it is detrimental from an evolutionary standpoint to limit the gene pool of one's own species by eating kin.

And finally, cannibalism increases the risk of transmitting pathogens, because members of the same species are susceptible to the same set of pathogens, whereas more distantly related species often cannot catch the same types of infections.

Jefferson says that the findings are timely now, as Canadian ponds in the study areas of his colleagues have dried up in recent years, potentially as a result of climate change. Future climate effects may continue to shrink tadpole ponds, making them more densely populated and increasing competition for space. This could potentially increase the rate of cannibalism and the spread of pathogens.

The study findings were detailed Tuesday (Feb. 18) in the journal Naturwissenschaften.

Editor's Note: This story has been updated to clarify that tadpoles feeding on brine shrimp meat showed improvements in growth and development compared to tadpoles feeding on tadpole meat.

Copyright 2014 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe