New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Tap into Your Inner Einstein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Imagine a world in which every work of genius was stripped away, a world without great literature, art, philosophy, science or even technology. We would be living in a very barren world, huddling in some cave, shivering in the cold.”

So began a recent exchange with psychologist Dean Keith Simonton on the merits of studying genius. Few of us can be the best, I argued, playing devil's advocate, so why bother with the topic? Simonton countered that we can be proactive about encouraging genius, so that someday our present lives will look just as barren. In this special issue devoted to the topic of genius, we explore the cognitive components that make great works possible and ways to help brilliance bloom.

The first question most people ask about genius is how to define it. Singer-songwriter Beck offered this explanation: “Must have hair going everywhere.” The iconic Albert Einstein hair, captured on our cover, implies irreverence and a touch of eccentricity. As Simonton writes in “The Science of Genius,” starting on page 34, openness to peripheral ideas is common among highly innovative people. Their hobbies end up enriching their thought processes. Although it may sound like science fiction, in “Switching on Creativity,” neuroscientist Allan W. Snyder and his colleagues describe an experimental brain stimulation technique they are developing for inducing such openness and creative insight. Turn to page 58.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Families can foster creativity, too, once they see its early signs. Artistic sensibilities and even passion can emerge as early as age two. See page 42 for more on how talent unfolds in “Predicting Artistic Brilliance,” by psychologists Jennifer E. Drake and Ellen Winner. Exposing youngsters to a wide range of experiences increases the chances that a child will get inspired and start developing a new skill, as psychologist Rena F. Subotnik et al. write in “Nurturing the Young Genius,” on page 50.

No crazy hair? No problem. Let our experts help you tap into your inner Einstein. Great minds really do think alike—and that is excellent news for the rest of us.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe