New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New EPA List Points to Possible Regulations for 104 Chemicals Found in Tap Water

This is the longest list of potential contaminants ever compiled by the agency

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

U.S. EPA has found 104 chemicals that might require regulations to keep them out of tap water—the longest list of potential contaminants ever compiled by the agency.

A 1996 law requires EPA to evaluate possible tap-water pollutants every five years and make regulatory determinations for at least five of them.

The new list—the agency's third—includes pesticides, commercial chemicals, disinfection byproducts and, for the first time, pharmaceuticals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The thing that they did differently this time was they looked at a much bigger universe to start out with," said Mae Wu, a staff attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. "They kind of looked at every potential chemical that could end up in drinking water. It's a lot more extensive than the first two lists."

But the agency has yet to regulate a single contaminant that has appeared on any of the lists, Wu said.

"There are some flaws in the process," she said. "They just have to make a determination on five of them. That decision can be that they're not going to do anything about it."

The agency monitors 91 contaminants in tap water, with most chosen for regulation decades ago.

EPA said it evaluated approximately 7,500 contaminants for the new list, ultimately selecting 104 chemicals and 12 microbes based on their potential to pose health risks through drinking water exposure.

The agency said it will continue to research the contaminants and will determine by 2013 whether to propose drinking water regulations for some of them.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe