New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Take on Taylor Swift’s Linguistic Eras

An analysis of Taylor Swift’s interviews suggests her speech pattern has changed over her career

Taylor Swift gestures while speaking at NYU commencement ceremony

Taylor Swift delivered a commencement address to New York University graduates in May 2022.

Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

Researchers have confirmed what Taylor Swift fans have long suspected: the music megastar’s dialect and pitch have shifted throughout her career.

In the early stages of Swift’s music career, while she was living near Nashville, Tennessee, her speech had the hallmarks of a southern US accent. When she released her pop album Red in 2012, the southern twang had faded, suggest researchers who have analysed her voice. It changed again when she moved to New York City, they say.

A person’s dialect is typically associated with the region they are from, although it can change throughout their lifetime. But being able to study how they change is rare, says Matthew Winn, an audiologist at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities in Minneapolis. “We cannot typically follow someone around with a microphone,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Enter Tay Tay. “Taylor Swift has essentially been followed around with the microphone for most of her adult life,” says Winn.

Swift interviews

In the study published today in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Winn and his colleague analysed more than 100 minutes of Swift’s interviews across three distinct eras of her career. In 2008, Swift released Fearless while living near Nashville; in 2012, she released Red; and in 2019, Lover was released when she lived in New York City.

The pair used computer software to track how the pronunciation of Swift’s vowels changed. “As a person changes dialects — within English at least — mostly those changes are reflected in the vowels,” says Winn.

Early in her career, Swift’s pronunciation of ‘i’ in words such as ‘ride’ became shorter, pronouncing the word more like ‘rod’, which the researchers say is a classic southern US feature. The ‘oo’ sound in words like ‘two’ also changed to sound like ‘tee-you’, another southern signature.

Swift’s vowels lengthened around the time she started singing more pop music, with a clearer distinction between words such as ‘cot’ and ‘caught’, which the authors say is a feature of dialects in Pennsylvania, where Swift grew up, and New York.

The researchers suggest that these changes reflect Swift’s desire to be part of those communities. “I was one of those people who thought of dialects mainly as reflecting where you come from, but they obviously also reflect what kind of community you want to be a part of,” says Winn.

Alice Gaby, a linguist at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, says that the study confirms what people have noted — that Swift had a fairly marked shift in her pronunciation once she moved to Tennessee and then back to Pennsylvania again.

But Swift is no different from many other people who adapt their dialect throughout their lives, says Gaby. “It’s interesting to note that the change is not just specific to the location but also how she’s positioning herself,” she adds.

The researchers also found that the pitch of Swift’s voice got lower when she moved to New York City, a change that they suggest coincided with her emergence as a vocal advocate on social issues. But they acknowledge that this change might be age related.

Nature has reached out to Swift for comment on the study results.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 23, 2025.

Mohana Basu is a reporter at Nature News.

More by Mohana Basu

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe