The Eyes and Spectacles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS EDITORSOn page 235, this volume, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, I observe that one of your correspondents has discovered that he is "lonrsighted with his left eye, and shortsighted with his right eye, and asks if this is a common occurence ?" I would say it is not a common occurrence, although I have met with some twenty or thirty instances of it In the winter of 1831, a lady between forty and fifty years of age, came to my jewelry store in Burlington, Vt, where, after some hours' trial, I succeeded in suiting her eyes, by fitting a convex glass of twelve inches focal distance from one eye, and a concave glass, No 12, from the other eye, when the lady declared she could see with both eyes alike A gentleman in this city now wears his spectacles with a convex glass of some twelve to fifteen inches focal distance for one eye, but uses no glass for the other eye These were all caused by nature, not by accident To determine whether the eyes are "mates," take a pair of convex spectaclesif longsightedand look upon fine print, and observe whether each takes in the same number of lines, and if the same appear to be straight If shortsighted, take a pair of concave glasses, and look at a brick wall across the street, and observe as above The difference between the two eyes, if any, will at once be noticed R FITZGERALD New Haven, Ct, April, 1858

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 32This article was published with the title “The Eyes and Spectacles” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 32 (), p. 251
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04171858-251a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe