The Ghosts of Galaxies Past

Strangely moving stars may be the remnants of past galaxies devoured by our Milky Way

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

When you look up at the night sky, the stars that you see all reside in our own galaxy, the Milky Way. The nearest large galaxy to us, Andromeda, is more than two million light-years away, a distance 20 times the size of the main disk of our galaxy. With the unaided eye, you cannot make out its stars individually; they blend together into a faint fuzz. As far as our galaxy is concerned, those stars might as well inhabit a separate universe. Conversely, it is natural to think of the stars in our sky as native suns, born and bred within the confines of the Milky Way.

But then what do you make of Arcturus, the second brightest star in the northern sky? Arcturus moves in a subtly different way and has a slightly different chemical composition from that of most stars in the Milky Way; it shares its curious properties with a few other stellar mavericks scattered throughout the galaxy. The origin of these and other atypical stars has been a matter of heated debate since the 1960s. Did the gravity of our galaxy's spiral arms force them into oddball orbits, or are they immigrants, formed in regions beyond the Milky Way from material that was never part of it?

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American