New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The gut microbiome may influence brain aging, mouse study suggests

A communication pathway between the brain and the gut may be integral to how well the brain holds on to memories

Three bacterial cells

A conceptual illustration of the gut microbiome.

THOM LEACH/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Age changes the brain, but why some people remain mentally sharp well into their dotage while others don’t is a bit of a mystery. Part of the answer may have to do with genetics, but now a new study in mice suggests it could also have something to do with our gut.

In a series of experiments, researchers found that a communication pathway between the brain and the gut may be integral to how well the brain holds on to memories.

The genesis for the study came from a chance observation: young, two-month-old lab mice housed with older, 18-month-old mice showed “really impaired cognition,” says Timothy Cox, the study’s lead author and a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania. He and his colleagues suspected gut bacteria might be involved.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the study, researchers exposed young mice raised in a sterile, microbe-free environment to gut bacteria from old mice, causing the younger animals to perform worse on cognitive tests, as if they had prematurely aged, just like the cohoused mice. When young mice that were housed with older mice were given antibiotics, however, the effect was erased. And older, microbe-free mice still had good memory skills. Taken together, the results suggest that bacteria in the older mice’s gut made young mice perform like they had an old brain.

By sequencing the bacteria found in older mice’s feces, the researchers identified a culprit—a species of bacteria called Parabacteroides goldsteinii.

When the researchers exposed young mice that were raised in a sterile environment or treated with antibiotics to P. goldsteinii, the mice again performed worse in cognitive tests. P. goldsteinii, Cox explains, can trigger inflammation in mice, which could hinder the vagus nerve—the communication highway that conveys signals between the gut and the brain. Stimulating the vagus nerve also improved the mice’s cognitive performance. The findings were published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.

The findings build on previous research showing that the microbiomes of younger mice can “rejuvenate” the brain in older mice, says John Cryan, a professor of anatomy at University College Cork in Ireland, who was not involved in the new study. Multiple studies over the past decade have shown that “the microbiota-gut-brain axis” can influence brain function. “What this study adds is a much clearer mechanistic pathway,” he says.

Importantly, the study was conducted in mice, and its findings are not easily applicable to humans. The researchers emphasize that the results don’t indicate that young people who live with older adult humans might experience cognitive issues. For one, the human gut microbiome is complex in its own way. And for another, mice eat each one another’s feces. “I suspect that most people are not doing that,” Cox says.

But the results could one day lead to future therapies for memory issues and cognitive decline in people. P. goldsteinii is “certainly a member of the human microbiome,” says Christoph Thaiss, an assistant professor of pathology at Stanford University and co-senior author of the paper. But whether it affects cognitive decline in humans is unclear.

Vagus nerve stimulation, meanwhile, is an already approved procedure for various brain conditions, including stroke and epilepsy.

“It’s definitely not impossible to imagine a future where people stimulate their vagus nerve to counteract cognitive decline,” Thaiss says. “But we would need larger studies and clinical trials in order to figure this out.”

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe