The Harlem Railroad Tunnel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On Thursday morning ot last week, as the first train down was entering this tunnel, the engineer perceived something looming up dark on the track, put on the brakes, and arrested the train just in time to prevent a fearful collision, with a huge mass ot falling rock, and thus saved the lives of perhaps 30 or 40 passengers. There were about 400 passengers on the train, and had it been a night instead of a day train, there can be no doubt but a fearful loss of life would have been the result. It is good that a merciful Providence watches over the lives of the passengers who journey through that tunnel, lor the Railroad Company do not. Last year a mass of rock fell down in this tunnel just after a train had passed ; at that time we directed attention to a means for preventing the contingency of an accident by any such a cause ; this was to arch the whole interior of the tunnel with brick, wood, or iron. This will prevent the rock from falling down.— The Grand Jury of New York should indict the company for keeping this tunnel in such a state—it should be declared unsafe and dangerous. This should be done at once, for we are sure that no less than 10,000 passengers pass through this tunnel every day. One of the engineers, to our knowledge, has declared that he never enters this tunnel with his engine without experiencing a fearful foreboding. This is an evil which should be remedied at once. Will the Railroad Company see to it that this is done

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 7This article was published with the title “The Harlem Railroad Tunnel” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 7 (), p. 56
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10301852-56e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe