New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

‘The Moose’ and Other Military Planes May Have to Cut Cargo as Planet Warms

The C-17 Globemaster III—which transports troops and tanks—may have to shed weight as rising temperatures driven by climate change affect flying conditions

Airforce C17 Globemaster III taking off in desert landscape.

C17 Globemaster III taking off.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | One of the Air Force's largest airplanes may have to fly with smaller cargo loads due to climate change, according to new research published by the agency.

The C-17 Globemaster III is used to transport troops, tanks and other military equipment around the world. But the study — published in the journal Air & Space Operations Review — found that higher temperatures exacerbate what's known as "air density," which affects an aircraft’s ability to take off and maintain desired altitude.

As a result, C-17s may need to reduce payload weight by as much as 8.5 percent by 2039 under worst-case warming scenarios, researchers found. That figure could rise to nearly 30 percent by 2099.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Air Force officials “should expect to sustain dramatic performance degradation to all aviation assets, most clearly evidenced by the decreasing thrust production that mandates reduced takeoff weight in strategic airlift platforms,” researchers Kaitlyn Benton and Timothy Leslie wrote in the paper, “Barriers to Force Projection: Climate Change and Aerial Forward Operability.”

All airplanes, notably commercial passenger jets, must factor air density into takeoff and flying conditions. But air transporters at the Defense Department, which must traverse entire continents and oceans, could be particularly affected by climate change, according to the researchers.

The study used climate warming projection data from 2020 to 2099 to estimate changes in “air density altitude” under various climate change scenarios. By applying mathematical models to the datasets, the researchers were then able to estimate how shifting “air density thresholds” affect a C-17’s performance.

Leslie, an associate professor of geography at George Mason University, said in an email that “increased density altitude has a negative effect on the performance of all types of aircraft, though elements such as the weight and engine of a particular airframe will determine how much difference a specific density altitude change causes.”

The same principles apply to commercial aircraft, as evidenced by passenger flight disruptions during periods of prolonged extreme heat in the Southwest, including this summer’s swelter.

But the C-17, nicknamed “the moose,” is no ordinary aircraft. It is equipped with four turbofan engines capable of producing 40,440 pounds of thrust each, with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 585,000 pounds, according to the Air Force. The maximum payload for a C-17 is 170,900 pounds — and it can carry one Abrams tank, 10 armored Humvees, two tractor-trailer trucks or 100 fully geared paratroopers, according to an Air Force description sheet.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Daniel Cusick covers climate change adaptation and resilience. He joined E&E News in 2003 and has filed news stories from South Florida to Northern Minnesota. He has reported from more than a half dozen hurricane recovery zones and documented climate change impacts, resilience and energy transitions in East Africa. He lives in Minneapolis.

More by Daniel Cusick

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe