The New Steamboat Law at the West

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS-I might write you a long letter about the new Steamboat Law which has just gone into effect, and which, ir one particular, bears pretty heavy upon oui ligh-pressure boats, viz., in the amount or leight of steam they are limited to carry J leretofore there has been no limit, and whenever a boat did not wish to be beaten, they vould hang extra weight upon the boiler ralves. But now that they cannot carry more ;han 110 lbs. standing weight, or 160 running, t is a very different affair, and I think many )f our fastest boats will fall much short of the speed they have made heretofore. I see not low they can help themselves, unless it be by throwing aside their present engines and substituting larger ones, in order to get additional piston surface to make up for the diminished pressure; but then there is a serious objection bo that, as the weight of machinery would be boo great for the ordinary depth of water in Dur Western rivers. Many engineers object to the law, but I believe it is mainly because the law objects to them. J. 0. Campbell. Louisville, Ky.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 10This article was published with the title “The New Steamboat Law at the West” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 10 (), p. 75
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11201852-75c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe