The Thermo-Files

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some microorganisms like it hot. Be it the toasty springs at Yellowstone National Park or the infernal environs of deep-sea hydrothermal vents, these so-called thermophiles require heat in order to survive. Their extreme needs captivate scientists, who marvel at their biochemistry, ponder their evolutionary significance and imagine their biotechnological potential. Aiming to better understand these strange microbes, investigators have increasingly turned to genome sequencing. The latest genetic secrets, coming from a heat- and acid-loving organism dubbed Thermoplasma acidophilum, are revealed in today's issue of the journal Nature.

The decoding of T. acidophilum's genome, which at a mere 1.5 million base pairs is among the smallest unraveled to date, has yielded some surprises. Of particular interest is the fact that T. acidophilum sports a number of genes that it appears to have snagged from other species: 17 percent of its "open-reading frames" (protein-encoding regions of the genome) have relatives in the genome of a bacterium known as Sulfolobus solfataricus. In a commentary accompanying the Nature report, Don Cowan of University College London surmised that several factors might have contributed to T. acidophilum's propensity for gene aquisition, including its lack of a protective cell wall to prevent entry of large molecules into the cell.

The new results also speak against a theory put forth by evolutionary biologists. Noting the similarities between this microorganism and the eukaryotic cells that make up higher organisms, researchers had proposed that T. acidophilum was an ancestor to the eukaryotic cell. The new study, however, reveals that T. acidophilum's genes are more similar to bacterial genes. Obvious progress notwithstanding, Cowan concludes that scientists still have a long way to go in terms of understanding gene function in general. "As yet, we do not know what 45 percent of the protein-coding regions in T. acidophilum do," he notes. "That is a lot of genes."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe