The Woodworth Patent Suit in North Carolina Terminated

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most of our readers, acquainted with planing machines, are probably aware that the. heaviest suit brought under the Wood worth Patent has been pending in the Circuit Court of North Carolina lor three years past: we mean the suit of Potter Kidder vs. P. K. Dickinson Co. Some ol the ablest .counsel in the country were retained in it, and twenty-five thousand dollars in the three years were expended by the parties in the preparation of the cause for a hearing. It was before the court at the last term, on a motion for an interlocutory injunction, and Mr. Justice Wayne ordered the complainants' bill to be amended as required by the answer, refused the injunction, and remarked that the pleadings on behalf of the defendants exced-ed any for ability, and the great number of new points raised, that had ever fallen under his notice. A case of more importance to the country and to the patent law hadne ver arisen, the defendant continually running the Gay machine, and the evidence covering every, thing known in relation to the Woodworth patent and all the planing machines in this and foreign countries. Having reached this crisis, the complainants proposed to dismiss the bill, each party paying their own costs— and thus has ended this vigorously prosecuted and most vigorously defended suit of any that has yet been brought under the Woodworth Patent.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 30This article was published with the title “The Woodworth Patent Suit in North Carolina Terminated” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 30 (), p. 238
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04091853-238

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe