New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The world’s deepest sensors will detect earthquakes around the world from far below Antarctica

Here’s how scientists drilled 8,000 feet through ice to place the world’s deepest seismometers

A close up of a drill drilling into a thick chunk of ice.

Researchers drilled 8,000 feet into South Pole ice to install two seismometers.

Robert Anthony/USGS

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On the surface, Antarctica’s vast ice sheet appears still and unchanging. But deep below, vibrations ripple through the frozen plain, transmitting the movements of Earth’s tectonic plates—and scientists now have a formidable new set of tools to listen in with. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), collaborating with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole, has installed the deepest seismometers ever deployed. At 8,000 feet under the ice, the two instruments will record earthquakes of magnitude 5 or greater anywhere on the planet with unprecedented accuracy and help to reveal new details of Earth’s deep interior in the process.

The South Pole is one of Earth’s quietest places because there is very little humanmade infrastructure and no background “noise” from the planet’s rotation, which can distort seismometer data. At their depth, the new seismometers may also be shielded from disruptive changes in atmospheric pressure, says USGS research geophysicist Robert Anthony, the Deep Ice Seismometer project manager.

Engineers “drilled” holes by shooting pressurized hot water into the ice to melt it. “The drill is producing as much energy as the most powerful steam locomotive ever made and channeling it all through an orifice the size of a penny,” Anthony says. At a rate of roughly three feet per minute, the drill can complete a hole in about 50 hours, after which the team has another 50 hours to lower strings of instrumentation before the ice refreezes. To contend with the pressure at a depth of 8,000 feet, the seismometers are encased in a stainless steel vessel built to withstand 10,000 pounds per square inch.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each seismometer contains a small pendulum suspended within a magnetic field; when a vibration reaches the sensor, a resistor measures the magnetic-field strength required to keep the pendulum stationary. “This lets us record lower-frequency ground motions all the way down to the solid Earth tides driven by the gravitational attraction of the sun, Earth and moon,” Anthony says. Scientists can use these data to quickly characterize how a fault moved to generate an earthquake, which can help them determine whether it also triggered a tsunami. The South Pole station fills a significant gap in global seismic coverage, researchers say, because of its distance from other stations and the lack of interference from Earth’s rotation.

“Earthquake waves don’t just shake the surface; they go in all directions, including down,” says David Wilson, director of the Global Seismographic Network. The deep seismometers will be particularly good at recording long-period seismic waves created by large earthquakes (about magnitude 7 or greater). “These waves can go on for months after a large earthquake because there’s nowhere for the energy to go to dissipate,” Wilson says. “Imagine hitting a bell. It’s going to sit there and ring until the energy completely dies down.”

Vanessa Bates Ramirez is a science and technology journalist focused on energy and climate tech, artificial intelligence and biotechnology. Her work has appeared in Time magazine, Forbes, AI Frontiers, Scientific American and SingularityHub, among other outlets. Follow Ramirez on X @vanessabramirez

More by Vanessa Bates Ramirez
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 5This article was published with the title “An Icy Ear” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 5 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052026-4Lva1sjiA8sZi97wvtrrIs

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe