New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

This organoid can menstruate—and shows how tissue can repair itself

Mini models of the uterus lining give insight into mystery of how it is shed without scarring

Cropped image of young woman holding her stomach.

LaylaBird/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have developed organoids that can regenerate like the endometrium, the lining of the uterus that sheds and re-forms during the menstrual cycle. The team used the miniature 3D structures to simulate rarely seen repair processes, which could inform future therapeutic strategies for tissue renewal and wound healing. The findings were published in Cell Stem Cell on 28 April.

The endometrium has a unique ability to repair itself after menstrual shedding without scarring, but how it does this is a mystery. Until this study, it had been difficult to replicate the activity in the laboratory and studying it in people is too invasive, says co-author Konstantina Nikolakopoulou, a molecular biologist who did the research while at the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Basel, Switzerland.

“It is fantastic to have a model system that you can do experiments on,” says Deena Emera, an evolutionary biologist at the Buck Institute for Research on Aging in Novato, California. Insights about endometrium repair will not only help scientists to improve understanding of gynaecological diseases such as endometriosis, but also could be relevant to regeneration research in other tissues.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lab-grown tissue

Nikolakopoulou’s organoids were developed on the basis of models that her former supervisor created in 2017. For those models, the researchers took a biopsy from a person’s endometrium, separated the cell types and mixed only the epithelial cells — the main tissue type in the endometrium — with a gelatinous membrane. This enabled the cells to self-organize into a hollow, spherical structure that acted like the endometrium.

Nikolakopoulou and her team took the model to the next level by emulating the menstrual cycle in its cells. First, they treated the organoids with oestrogen and progesterone, hormones that signal the transition of menstrual phases. The team then withdrew the hormones, which happens naturally at this point in the cycle owing to activity in the ovaries. In people, the reduction of progesterone causes shedding of the endometrium, or menstruation. The type of cells that trigger shedding was not present in the organoid, which meant that the team had to mechanically break down the tissue with a pipette to simulate degeneration. They then watched as it regenerated, just like in a human endometrium.

Nikolakopoulou says the organoids are simple and contain only epithelial cells rather than an entire microenvironment of various cell types, such as immune, stromal and endothelial cells, and components such as oxygen and blood. It’s best to first understand how to “break down the puzzle, and then start increasing complexity,” she says.

Luminal helpers

Past research in primates has suggested that deep-tissue stem cells are responsible for the renewal of the endometrium.

But when Nikolakopoulou and her colleagues analysed the tissue that the organoids shed, they saw that luminal cells, another type of epithelial cell, were involved. Located at the surface of the endometrium, these cells help embryos to implant in the endometrium before pregnancy.

The team also found that the luminal cells expressed a gene called WNT7A, which is known to support tissue regeneration in primates.

Intrigued by the presence of WNT7A, the researchers cloned the organoids and used gene editing to remove it. They found that the clones’ growth and survival potential were compromised compared with the original organoids.

When they looked at some of the few endometrium samples that they have from people, they also detected the presence of luminal cells and expression of WNT7A before the endometrium reforms, supporting their role in regeneration.

Future directions for organoid development should be to increase the complexity represented in the uterine microenvironment, Nikolakopoulou says. Emera agrees that more-advanced organoid models with a greater diversity of cell types could imitate the tissue-breakdown process more accurately than the team’s mechanical method.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on May 1, 2026.

Claudia Steiner is a science journalist and intern at Nature Portfolio.

More by Claudia Steiner

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe