Three Weeks more and the Result will be Settled

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We would call the attention of our readers bo the fact that there are only three weeks more before the successful competitors for our prize list of Fifteen Hundred Dollars will be rewarded for their exertions. Every one who has entered the field of competition cannot expect to reap the reward in cash, but fifteen of those who have best succeeded in obtaining subscribers for our publication will receive, in the aggregate, fifteen hundred dollars, in sums varying in amount to each, according to the number of mail subscribers they have sent in to us, and paid for, since this volume of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN was commenced. Those few who entered the course for competition when the announcement of the prizes was first made, but who have not, from their own inertness, or from the pressure of the times, continued in the contest, will, we hope, feel that they are well repaid for the exertion they at first put forth, in the consciousness that they have done-their neighbors and townsmen a favor by introducing the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN to their notice, and inducing them to subscribe, and thus insnre the weekly visit of a paper in which no information of a pernicious or demoralizing character appears; we regret to say this can be asserted of but very few literary papers of the present day. The benefits and pleasures which these subscribers and their families derive from the weekly visit of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, we leave for each patron to estimate for himself. A few days ago, we were led by curiosity to foot up the amounts remitted to us by a single competitor, and, from the names sent, to calculate whereabout in the list of prizes he would stand : we found to our astonishment that, if the awards had been made on that day, the competitor in question would not only have received back the full amount which he had remitted for all his subscribers, but would have received the additional sum of $160. We ceased our calculations when we arrived at this result, fearing lest we might arrive at still less satisfactory conclusions to ourselves by looking into the prospects of other competitors. This example shows what an opportunity still remains for some of the smaller competitors to augment their lists of names during the next three weeks, and then to receive a respectable sum for their exertions, over and above the total investment.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 14This article was published with the title “Three Weeks more and the Result will be Settled” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 14 (), p. 109
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12121857-109c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe