To Correspondents - July 30, 1853


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


J. McC, of N. Y.—We have in our possession a fountain pen which was imported from England in 1846, which operates and is constructed on precisely the same plan as the one you describe. R. H. S-, of 0.—Your corn planter is not new. We have had several models sent to us which contain the identical principles of your machine. E. C, of Mass.—Your diagram of a water gauge represents no new invention. E. A. D,, of N. Y.—The application of an india rubberspringj adapted in any like manner to your drawing, would not be patentable, nor practicable in use. D. D., of 111.—As we understand your description, you merely duplicate the implements used ; a mere multiplication of parts does not make a patentable subject, any more than it would make a patentable combination to work several different machines from one shaft. P. Mr.S , of Md.—The Dublin Crystal Palace is an affair highly creditable to the spirit of eld Ireland ; the benificence of one man, once poor, raised the structure. G. C , of Me.—The Wheeling Bridge is permitted to stand ; the road which the bridge accommodates has been made a post road since the litigation was had, therefore the structure will not be molested. The only effectual remedy we ever knew for sea sickness was to remain on land. J. M M., of Michigan—We think your anvil for straightening and repairing the T-rail would be patentable, but the forge refrigerator we think would not, unless a legitimate combination could be made by making one part of the invention Btrictly dependent on the other, in that case they might both be probably patented under one application. C. B., of Pa.—Your plan for balancing window sash is certainly novel, and we see no objection to its operating well. We are of the opinion that it is patentable, and would recommend you to Bend us a model. E. G. B.. of N. C—The engine and boiler, with every thing complete, is offered for $500, to close a concern. We think the property would be cheap at %&)Q ; tlitt eugine is entirely new, and the boiler is in mjd condition. The information about the puuip we cannot give. J M C , of Ct.—We made an application for a patent on a Meat Cutter, about nine months ago,which we believe ia preeisely like yours. J. A. P., of Ohio—We do not know of a ainglegood and practical work on the manufacture of woolen goods. G. R., of Ohio—An endless chain water motor (not * wheel) is old and well known, it consists of a series of Duckets on an endless belt reaching from the top to the bottom of a fall, taking in the water on one side onlj; no such motor, to our knonled&e, ii G. J, of Ohio—Yours has been received. Seek wisdom with a different spirit and von may find it J. M., of N. Y.—Ifyou could give us the name of the Englishman you speak of, we could soon give you positive information ; at present we have no re-oollection of his patent. We have a reoeipt for the enamel jou apeak of. G. H., of Va.—You can find the plan described for making horse-shoe magneta in any good work on the subject; it would be too longforus to describe. Tour plan of a railroad double car is plausible, wa can see no objection to its success in popnlous localities. C. H. F.i of R. I.—We publish the claims of all the patents that issue, and if a patent was granted to the party to whom jou allude, his claim must be found in the Sci. Am. We are often requested by inventors to suppress the publication of their claims, but it is only by that class of inventors wh ose patents arehingedupon useless or invalid claims. H. J. O. of Pa.—When you get your machine in the citj we shall be happy to take drawings of it for publication. We have no drawings from which to get up engravings at present. Your claim yon will find in another column. See the back volumes of the Sci. Am, for receipts on tempering. Money received on account of Patent Office busi-nesa for the week ending Saturday, July 23:— I. M K,of III, $30 ; G. N. S., of N. Y., $80 ; E. P, of 111., $37 : W. W., of N. Y., $20 ; 8. B. & Co., of Mass.. $9, W. D. C, of-----,$30; W. Mt.S, of N. Y., $325 : W. T. M , of N. Y., $30 ; H. A., of N. Y., *?0; N. &G,of N. Y..$25. Specifications and drawings belonging to parties with the following initials have been forwarded to the Patent Office during the week ending Saturday July 23:— H. A., of N. Y.j W. K. P., of Mass.; G. N. S., of N. Y.: AT. C, of Pa.; G. &B., of N. Y.; G. H. D, of Pa.; J. B. W., of N.J.; A.S.,ofO ; E. P., of 111.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 46This article was published with the title “To Correspondents” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 46 (), p. 367
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07301853-367

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe