New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Too Many Hours

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the U.S., physicians fresh out of medical school regularly work far more hours than those in the U.K. and the European Union. Despite efforts by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to cut hours to curtail mistakes, medical residents reported routinely exceeding the limits, based on a survey of 4,000 residents conducted between July 2002 and May 2004.

Limit of consecutive work hours for residents in:

U.K. and E.U.: 13


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


U.S.: 30

Limit of work hours per week in:

U.K. and E.U.: 58

U.S.: 80

Percent in the U.S. who worked more than 30 hours consecutively at least once: 67

Percent who worked more than 80 hours per week: 43

Percent of monthly work logs that showed some violation: 44

SOURCES: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 6; British Medical Association; “Medical Residents Overworked despite New Work Rules” on www.sciam.com (September 5).

Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Too Many Hours” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 5 (), p. 37
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1106-37d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe