New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Trevor GrandPre

Building models to understand how self-organizing structures in cells lead to disease

Stylized illustration portrait of Trevor GrandPre by Jessine Hein.

Jessine Hein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Trevor GrandPre started college aiming to be a physician, but after volunteering at a hospital he found that the job was a lot less like the TV show House than he had hoped—and he hated the sight of blood. Now he’s at Washington University in St. Louis, combining physics and biology in the study of biomolecular condensates, self-organizing blobs of RNA and proteins that band together and fall apart to protect cells and help them move, process nutrients, and more.

There are probably hundreds of these condensates; one of the first GrandPre studied helps to drive photosynthesis in plant cells, and another is important to immune cell activation. Some condensates do good work, he says—such as a cell’s nucleolus, which helps it make the machinery to build proteins—but others can be harmful, such as condensate-based protein aggregates associated with certain neurodegenerative diseases.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


GrandPre’s mission? “To understand the good ones,” he says, “and to reinforce what makes them function properly, but also to stop the bad ones from forming or dissolve the bad ones once they’ve formed.” He’s developing theories and building computational models to predict how condensates will function—and malfunction.

The field of biomolecular condensates is only growing, GrandPre says, and it will take an aggregation of theorists, biologists, engineers, chemists, and more to fully explore this fascinating area of study. “What draws me to this field is that there’s something in it for everybody,” he says.

But the current political climate is narrowing focuses and affecting budgets, so although the future of biomolecular condensates is bright, GrandPre emphasizes that the basic research needed to understand them still needs to be prioritized alongside growing applications. He says he has to “be more strategic at explaining why we need to understand the fundamentals.”

This article is part of The Young American Scientists, an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron.

Sarah Lewin Frasier is a senior editor at Scientific American. She plans, assigns and edits the Advances section of the monthly magazine, as well as editing online news, and she launched Scientific American’s Games section in 2024. Before joining Scientific American in 2019, she chronicled humanity’s journey to the stars as associate editor at Space.com. (And even earlier, she was a print intern at Scientific American.) Frasier holds an A.B. in mathematics from Brown University and an M.A. in journalism from New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She enjoys musical theater and mathematical paper craft.

More by Sarah Lewin Frasier
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Trevor GrandPre” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 1 (), p. 47
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072026-3IA8Crz0t1fjCRN4ROEi6f

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe