Trial of Fire-Arms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS EDITORS—On page 214, present volume of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, I find a challenge from Lieut J C Symmes, addressed to all inventors of breechloading'guns I am ready to accept the challenge, upon the conditions that at least three hundred shots shall be fired without cleaning the guns This will give a fair test of their accuracy of fire, and at the same time test the working of the machinery This last test I consider the most important feature in connection with breechloading firearms GILBERT SMITH Buttermilk Falls, N Y, March, 1858 [We admit Mr Smith's card in response to the challenge of Lieut Symmes, as it is the first one which we have received, and it specifies conditions which are important in judging the utility of this class of firearms Parties propose to enter upon this contest will future address their responses to Lieut inmes, at the Watertown (Mass) Arsenal, instead of to us—EDS

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 30This article was published with the title “Trial of Fire-Arms” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 30 (), p. 238
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04031858-238b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe