New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Trump rolls back fuel economy standards for cars, breaking with 50 years of policy

Environmental advocates have decried the move

Exhaust fumes from behind a car.

New fuel regulations will require light-duty vehicles such as passenger cars to use 34.9 miles per gallon by 2031, down from former president Joe Biden’s plan for such vehicles to achieve 50.4 miles per gallon in the same time span.

deepblue4you/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back fuel regulations. Advocates say the move could prove “disastrous” for the environment and the economy.

Since the 1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act, cars have generally gotten more fuel-efficient, while regulations on fuel economy have tightened. In 1975 passenger cars could, on average, drive 13.1 miles on a single gallon of gas—in 2024 the average car could get 35.4 miles to the gallon.

The new policy will require cars and other light vehicles to run at 34.9 miles per gallon by 2031—a sharp reduction in ambition from former president Joe Biden’s plan to have new cars run at 50.4 miles per gallon within the same period.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said in a statement that the rule change would lower car prices.

“Newer cars are safer cars,” said National Highway Traffic Safety Administration chief Jonathan Morrison in the same statement. “By reducing vehicle prices, more American families will be able to afford newer vehicles, and sensible standards allow automakers more freedom to design and produce vehicles consumers actually want.”

Andy Su, a transportation lawyer at the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, says the new regulations could mean a “disastrous future” for the economy and the environment. Lower fuel efficiency will mean more trips to the gas station over a car’s lifetime, he says, costing drivers at least $1,600.

“For decades, our national fuel economy standards have steadily made our vehicles more efficient and less expensive to drive,” Su says. The new standards “are a sharp U-turn that will mean more wasted gas, more pollution and higher costs for Americans who are already struggling with higher fuel prices.”

The changes will go into effect for all passenger cars and light trucks with a model year from 2022 to 2031, with an up to 1 percent increase in fuel efficiency each year.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe