New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Trump EPA Spending Freeze Continues despite Court Orders

Two judges have ordered the Trump administration to lift a freeze on spending, including at the Environmental Protection Agency. But nonprofits and states still can’t get money for contracts that are backed by the Inflation Reduction Act

2 workers installing solar panels.

Grid Alternatives employees hoist a solar panel as they install no-cost solar panels on the rooftop of a low-income household on Oct. 19, 2023, in Pomona, California.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | The Trump administration is still freezing many climate and infrastructure grants despite two federal court orders barring it from doing so.

Nonprofits and state agencies still lacked access Monday to EPA grant awards funded through the Inflation Reduction Act. Two district court judges have issued orders to reverse such spending freezes — with U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan reinforcing her order Monday.

EPA administers several major grant programs under the climate law, including the nearly $5 billion Climate Pollution Reduction Grant program and the $7 billion Solar for All program, which supports community and rooftop solar projects in low-income neighborhoods. The overwhelming majority of those grants were final when former President Joe Biden left office last month, and the Trump EPA has few clear options to pull back funds or repurpose the awards.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


EPA is not the only agency that has halted payouts from the IRA and the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law, said Jillian Blanchard, vice president for climate change and environmental justice with Lawyers for Good Government. She said grant recipients at the Agriculture and Energy departments are also reporting that they can't access funds.

“People cannot get into their accounts. They can't access funding. They're waiting on invoices to be paid. No one will call them back,” she said.

EPA program recipients told POLITICO's E&E News on Monday that the inability to access funds was already having an impact after one week. The recipients, granted anonymity to avoid retribution, said they have had to lay out money for expenses, like payroll or rent, without knowing if and when it would be reimbursed. The freeze has also prompted some recipients to pause hiring — and worry about how long they could pay existing staff.

The Justice Department in a filing Monday acknowledged AliKhan’s order and pledged to inform agencies of it. But it argued that the order “contains several ambiguous terms and provisions that could be read to constitute significant intrusions on the executive branch’s lawful authorities and the separation of powers.”

EPA’s acting General Counsel Sean Donahue sent an agency “mass mailer” to all employees before 9 a.m. Monday morning that linked to the temporary restraining order. He promised “additional EPA-specific guidance on agency financial assistance,” which sources said was not sent as of Monday evening.

EPA declined to respond to an inquiry from E&E News about why the funds remained frozen, referring questions to DOJ. EPA did not acknowledge questions about whether the delay was due to a technical difficulty or whether the agency believed it was complying with the court order.

DOJ declined to comment.

Zealan Hoover, former director of implementation at Biden’s EPA, said the Trump administration appeared to be trying to dodge the order.

“I am very concerned that this illegal action will force state and local governments to pause construction, lay off staff and slow their work to provide cleaner air and water,” he said.

Blanchard echoed that concern.

“It looks like this executive is considering just completely flouting a court's direct order,” she said.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2025. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe