New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Trump moves to end protections for 44 million acres of U.S. forests

The 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule protects the nation’s forests from logging and other industry activities

A scenic view of the San Francisco Peaks and aspen trees that surround Lockett Meadow in Arizona.

Coconino National Forest.

stockphoto52/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Trump administration on Tuesday proposed a rule change that would end protections for more than 44 million acres of forest land. The U.S. Department of Agriculture plan would throw out a 25-year-old policy that has prevented logging, road building and other development in some of the nation’s most renowned woodlands.

The move would scrap 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule; the idea has been widely decried by environmental groups as risking the demise of some of the nation’s most crucial natural wildernesses.

In a press release, the USDA described the policy as a “one-size-fits-all restriction” that has “frustrated land managers and served as a barrier to wildfire risk reduction work” in the country’s national forests. National forestland currently encompasses around 193 million acres.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nixing the law would allow for certain management practices, such as thinning forests to prevent wildfires and controlling insects, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said in the same press release. It would also give more power to local forest managers over how to use roadless land, particularly in the western U.S.

The Roadless Area Conservation Rule was originally established under President Bill Clinton. It was intended to protect tens of millions of acres of national forestlands without roads from further development.

“The Trump administration is moving to gut our most iconic national forests by giving loggers and drillers free rein to turn them into industrial wastelands,” said Andrew Wetzler, senior vice president for nature at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), in a statement. “It is trying to walk away from the most successful land conservation policy in modern U.S. history.”

The Center for Biological Diversity said in a separate statement that roadless areas offer connected habitat to imperiled species such as grizzly bears and wolverines. Opening those areas for development would “push these species closer to extinction” and threaten others, the center said.

The proposed rule must go through a 30-day public comment period before it can be finalized.

Editor’s Note (8/18/26): This is a breaking news story and may be updated.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe