New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Trump’s State of the Union speech made no mention of Make America Healthy Again

On Tuesday the U.S. president largely steered clear of his administration’s health care agenda amid a broader push to downplay antivaccine efforts ahead of upcoming midterm elections

President Trump delivering State of the Union address as JD Vance and Mike Johnson look on

U.S. President Donald Trump, with Vice President J.D. Vance and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson looking on, delivers his State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol on February 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harnik/Staff/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

U.S. president Donald Trump’s record-long State of the Union speech on Tuesday ranged over topics from immigration to the economy to military strikes on Iran to crime. But one pillar of his administration’s second-term agenda was conspicuously missing: “Make America Healthy Again,” or MAHA.

Supporters of the MAHA movement, which has been led by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., have championed the removal of ultraprocessed ingredients and additives from food and remade the national dietary guidance. Under Kennedy, the Department of Health and Human Services and its affiliated agencies have sought to overhaul drug development and endorsed, without evidence, skepticism toward vaccines. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention upended its vaccine schedule earlier this year to reduce the number of diseases that it recommends children routinely get shots for from 17 to 11.

These moves have not been without controversy. Although childhood vaccination rates have declined worldwide since the COVID pandemic, routine childhood vaccines remain widely popular. Physicians and other medical experts seem to be ignoring the recent CDC changes to the vaccine schedule. The lack of MAHA in Trump’s Tuesday address and recent shake-ups among HHS leadership suggest the Trump administration may be deemphasizing MAHA and any antivaccine efforts ahead of the upcoming 2026 midterm elections.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the one-hour-and-48-minute speech, Trump spent fewer than five minutes on health care. The president mentioned TrumpRx, his signature prescription drug pricing program, and his desire to make in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment more affordable. He did not mention the MAHA movement once.

The omission is notable, given the prominent role MAHA played in Trump’s presidential campaign and Kennedy’s sweeping actions during his first year as health secretary. But cracks have appeared in the MAHA movement in recent months. In addition to pushback against the vaccine schedule changes, some MAHA supporters have taken issue with Kennedy’s support for Trump’s recent executive order promoting the production of the weed killer glyphosate, which public health experts have deemed a “probable carcinogen.”

MAHA has not been entirely eclipsed, however. On Wednesday Trump’s surgeon general pick Casey Means appeared before a Senate committee for a confirmation hearing. Means is a prominent MAHA advocate and has previously been critical of the food and drug industries for minimizing how much a healthy diet can help to prevent disease, a cornerstone belief of the MAHA movement.

Ahead of Trump’s speech, some Republicans had expressed fear that they could suffer significant electoral losses in the midterms. It remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will veer away from the more controversial aspects of Kennedy’s agenda and refocus on areas such as nutrition, which are broadly popular.

Tanya Lewis was formerly senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She wrote and edited stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appeared on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and wrote Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She held a number of positions over her nearly 10 years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe