New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Ultraviolet Glow Betrays Impending Supernova

Astronomers spot earliest light signifying a star's doom

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the latest in a series of supernova firsts, scientists report in Science that they pinpointed a star that flared in the ultraviolet portion of the spectrum for several hours before blowing itself apart in a supernova. The researchers believe the finding represents the earliest visible sign of an imminent supernova—a surge in temperature as the expanding internal shock wave strains to break free of the star but has yet to shred it apart.

A type II supernova, or stellar explosion, occurs when a star of at least eight times our sun's mass runs out of nuclear fuel at its core. Without nuclear energy to puff it up, its massive gravity causes the core to implode, producing a shock wave that rips through the star's outer layer and finally blows it apart, releasing a flood of x-rays. But researchers believe that the first sign of death would actually be the heating of the star's surface as the expanding shock wave sends out hot radiation ahead of it.

"The first photons that would tell you this core collapse has happened are these UV photons," says astronomer Kevin Schawinski of the University of Oxford in England, who led the study. "It's really precious information, because when the shock wave then hits the surface of the star, there's very little information about the star that's left," he says, because the star itself is destroyed."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers typically detect supernovae as flashes of visible light, which occur a few days after the actual explosion as the radiation cools down. To probe deeper, they have to either get creative—or lucky. In March, astronomers reported that they had observed an outburst of x-rays from the supernova SN 2008D when it happened to go off while a telescope was trained on its home galaxy to study a previous supernova.

In the new study, Schawinski and his colleagues compared a database of supernovae spotted by their visible light with measurements of ultraviolet light from stars taken in early 2004 by NASA's GALEX (Galaxy Evolution Explorer) satellite. They found one explosion—dubbed SNLS-04D2dc—for which the parent star began to shine in the ultraviolet for seven hours. They estimated that the shock wave reached the surface of the star four hours into the UV flare-up.

Schawinski says the duration of the ultraviolet glow indicates the size of the star. In this case, it was apparently in a bloated form known as a red supergiant. He says the hot radiation from the shock wave would have rapidly heated the star, shifting its color from red to blue-white and finally into the ultraviolet.

So are researchers going to turn around next week and find an even earlier sign of an impending supernova? That's pretty unlikely. They believe there would indeed be two earlier signals of core collapse—a burst of ghostly particles called neutrinos that are generated during nuclear reactions and a clatter of spacetime ripples known as gravitational waves—but either would be challenging to detect. (Gravitational waves, in fact, still elude astronomers, although experiments are underway to find them.)

Too bad, because they would shed light on the central mystery of supernovae, Schawinski says: "How does the energy go from the core collapse to destroy the star?" People have ideas, he says, but "the step in between those two we still don't understand well at all."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe