New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Updates: Whatever Happened to Midsize Black Holes?

Also: updates on HIV's origins, Neandertal fishing and transgenic guidelines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rules for Genetically Engineered Animals
After years of anticipation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released in September preliminary guidelines for genetically engineered animals [see “Does the World Need GM Foods?”; SciAm, April 2001]. The agency, which deemed that cloned meat poses no extra risk, wants to regulate engineered animals as it does drugs. Producers would have to substantiate claims and demonstrate safety. Consumer groups complain that the draft sets no provision for labeling and that safety trials can be done behind closed doors, as is the case for drug applications. Public comment on the draft ended in mid-November, and the FDA was to issue its final guidelines shortly thereafter.

No Middle Ground
Astronomers know of the giant black holes at galactic cores and the comparatively lightweight versions that form when stars collapse. But what of black holes in between? [See “Hole in the Middle”; SciAm, April 2001.] Such midsize versions now seem to be especially rare. Their best hiding places were thought to be at the centers of dense clumps of stars called globular clusters. Resembling miniature galaxies, these clusters should have matching-size black holes, scientists reasoned. A recent examination of globular cluster RZ2109, however, reveals that it possesses a small black hole. Its presence implies that RZ2109 does not have a medium black hole, which would have pulled in the small one. The findings hole up in the August 20 Astrophysical Journal Letters.
 —Charles Q. Choi

Longtime Companion
A lymph node biopsy taken in 1960 from a woman who lived in what is now Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, contained traces of the HIV-1 genome. Comparison with existing HIV sequences suggests that HIV surfaced in 1908, pushing back by a decade an earlier estimate based on an infected blood sample collected from the same city in 1959. The finding, in the October 2 Nature, suggests that trade routes may have contributed to the emergence of the virus, which most likely originated among chimpanzees in Cameroon, hundreds of kilometers from Kinshasa. Understanding HIV’s origin could lead to better AIDS therapies [see “HIV 25 Years Later: The Big Challenges”; SciAm, November 2008].


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Resourceful Neandertals
Our Ice Age cousins the Neandertals were hardly the doltish brutes that scientists once believed them to be [see “Who Were the Neandertals?”; SciAm, April 2000]. This realization has raised the question of why they lost out to Homo sapiens. Some experts have argued that H. sapiens outcompeted them by exploiting a wider variety of foods than did the Neandertals, who seemed to have subsisted mostly on large, dangerous land mammals such as woolly rhinos. But researchers writing in the September 23 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA report that Neandertals at two coastal sites in Gibraltar—Vanguard Cave and Gorham’s Cave—routinely dined on mollusks, fish, seals and dolphins for tens of thousands of years. With Neandertals apparently able to formulate hunting and gathering strategies as advanced as those of the modern humans who lived after them at these sites, the secret of H. sapiens success is more mysterious than ever.
—Kate Wong

Note: This story was originally printed with the title, "Updates".

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong
Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Updates: Whatever Happened to Midsize Black Holes?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122008-2L9pIkItVdUfLmEzeF2Fb9

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe