Updates: Whatever Happened to Midsize Black Holes?

Also: updates on HIV's origins, Neandertal fishing and transgenic guidelines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rules for Genetically Engineered Animals
After years of anticipation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released in September preliminary guidelines for genetically engineered animals [see “Does the World Need GM Foods?”; SciAm, April 2001]. The agency, which deemed that cloned meat poses no extra risk, wants to regulate engineered animals as it does drugs. Producers would have to substantiate claims and demonstrate safety. Consumer groups complain that the draft sets no provision for labeling and that safety trials can be done behind closed doors, as is the case for drug applications. Public comment on the draft ended in mid-November, and the FDA was to issue its final guidelines shortly thereafter.

No Middle Ground
Astronomers know of the giant black holes at galactic cores and the comparatively lightweight versions that form when stars collapse. But what of black holes in between? [See “Hole in the Middle”; SciAm, April 2001.] Such midsize versions now seem to be especially rare. Their best hiding places were thought to be at the centers of dense clumps of stars called globular clusters. Resembling miniature galaxies, these clusters should have matching-size black holes, scientists reasoned. A recent examination of globular cluster RZ2109, however, reveals that it possesses a small black hole. Its presence implies that RZ2109 does not have a medium black hole, which would have pulled in the small one. The findings hole up in the August 20 Astrophysical Journal Letters.
 —Charles Q. Choi

Longtime Companion
A lymph node biopsy taken in 1960 from a woman who lived in what is now Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, contained traces of the HIV-1 genome. Comparison with existing HIV sequences suggests that HIV surfaced in 1908, pushing back by a decade an earlier estimate based on an infected blood sample collected from the same city in 1959. The finding, in the October 2 Nature, suggests that trade routes may have contributed to the emergence of the virus, which most likely originated among chimpanzees in Cameroon, hundreds of kilometers from Kinshasa. Understanding HIV’s origin could lead to better AIDS therapies [see “HIV 25 Years Later: The Big Challenges”; SciAm, November 2008].


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Resourceful Neandertals
Our Ice Age cousins the Neandertals were hardly the doltish brutes that scientists once believed them to be [see “Who Were the Neandertals?”; SciAm, April 2000]. This realization has raised the question of why they lost out to Homo sapiens. Some experts have argued that H. sapiens outcompeted them by exploiting a wider variety of foods than did the Neandertals, who seemed to have subsisted mostly on large, dangerous land mammals such as woolly rhinos. But researchers writing in the September 23 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA report that Neandertals at two coastal sites in Gibraltar—Vanguard Cave and Gorham’s Cave—routinely dined on mollusks, fish, seals and dolphins for tens of thousands of years. With Neandertals apparently able to formulate hunting and gathering strategies as advanced as those of the modern humans who lived after them at these sites, the secret of H. sapiens success is more mysterious than ever.
—Kate Wong

Note: This story was originally printed with the title, "Updates".

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong
Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Updates: Whatever Happened to Midsize Black Holes?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122008-2L9pIkItVdUfLmEzeF2Fb9

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe