New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What Bugonia reveals about the real search for aliens

In the Oscar-nominated film Bugonia, Emma Stone’s character is accused of being an alien. But would we know extraterrestrial life if we saw it on Earth?

A photo of Emma Stone shaved bald in a scene from Bugonia

Universal Pictures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In Bugonia, it all starts with bees. A warehouse worker, Teddy (played by Jesse Plemons), accuses high-powered CEO Michelle (Emma Stone) of being an extraterrestrial who is secretly killing bees, disrupting the ecosystems humans depend on for food.

“The signs,” Teddy says, “are obvious.”

It’s a funny and gripping premise. But at the center of the movie is a compelling question that scientists all over the world are working to answer: How would we know if we saw an alien?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To identify alien life, scientists must be able to tell that the thing they are considering is alive. But there’s not as much consensus about what “life” really is as you might think.

"We don’t have a really clear theoretical and experimental program to ask questions about the nature of life,” says Sara Walker, an astrobiologist and theoretical physicist at Arizona State University. Essentially, our working criteria are based exclusively on life on Earth. But across the vastness of the universe, life might present as radically different from what we’ve seen on our planet.

Walker theorizes that life may not have to be based on organic molecules, cells and DNA, for example. Rather it might be easier to identify life using what she and her colleagues call “assembly theory,” which means spotting complex systems that stem from traceable lineages and that have changed their environment in a way that only a living entity could.

What might that look like beyond Earth? Well, we have no idea—yet. “The vast possibility space [of] life far exceeds both what has been actualized here on Earth in our one single biosphere and also potentially our imaginations,” says Mike Wong, an astrobiologist at the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Earth & Planets Laboratory.

Every living thing on Earth has been honed by millions of years of evolution and coevolution alongside all the other creatures and the planet’s different environments. It’s reasonable to assume that an alien probably won’t look anything like an Earthling, Wong says, because its evolutionary history could be determined by a radically different world with unique pressures and environments.

And as for Bugonia, “I think it would be highly unlikely that aliens would look like Emma Stone,” Wong says.

Even small distinctions between worlds can change evolutionary outcomes a lot. For example, take two identical Earths, says Nathalie Cabrol, an astrobiologist and director of the Carl Sagan Center for Research at the SETI Institute, a non-profit dedicated to searching for extraterrestrial intelligence. If one Earth has a fraction of a second’s difference in its orbit than the other, then it’s possible that “evolution is going to be drastically different,” she says. “You are going to have extinctions that are not timed the same way. You are going to be hit by more asteroids, or you are going to avoid one,” she speculates.

But for argument’s sake, let’s say an alien, as proposed in Bugonia, happens to look a lot like us. How would we know it wasn’t a human?

The last universal common ancestor of all life on Earth, known as LUCA, is embedded in every being’s genes. Because everything alive arose from LUCA, plants, animals and microbes all share certain basic traits, such as storing genetic information in DNA and RNA. Alien life, ostensibly, would have originated somewhere else and thus not share this common ancestor. As a result, the alien almost certainly wouldn’t have the same basic chemical or genetic building blocks that all life on Earth shares—and a simple genetic test would reveal that, Wong says.

As unlikely as it is that we will ever encounter an alien that just so happens to look like Emma Stone, Bugonia shows how fictional stories about aliens tend to be wrapped up in very real human problems, the SETI Institute’s Cabrol says.

“Why would I start looking at someone and say, ‘You are an alien’?” she says. “Is there something in our society today that says, ‘You look like something I can recognize, but it’s not really us’?”

Emma Gometz is a journalist and artist based in Queens, N.Y. Before becoming associate newsletter editor at Scientific American, Gometz was a digital producer for WNYC’s Science Friday. Their favorite musical is A Little Night Music.

More by Emma Gometz

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe