What caused the magnitude 6.8 earthquake in Japan?

The quake, which has caused damage to several roads and buildings, occurred along a strike-slip fault

A photo looking down an alleyway where parts of a wall have collapsed onto the sidewalk. People stand around in the distance.
The exterior wall of a shop is seen collapsed in an earthquake, in Kumamoto City on July 28, 2026.
Photo by JIJI Press / AFP via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck the southern Japanese island of Kyushu, south of the city of Kumamoto, on Tuesday afternoon local time. The earthquake has damaged roads and buildings, including a mall where rescue workers are seeking to extract trapped people.

The earthquake occurred along a strike-slip fault, where the two sides of a fracture in Earth’s crust slide past one another. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the earthquake happened on a fault in the upper Eurasia plate and is in an area where the Philippine Sea plate converges with the Eurasia plate at a rate of about 58 millimeters (2.3 inches) per year. The USGS estimates there is extensive, widespread damage from the earthquake.

Japan is a very tectonically active country, as it sits along the so-called Pacific Ring of Fire. It sits along a major subduction zone—earthquakes caused by subduction are major drivers of tsunamis, which was the mechanism behind the devastating 2011 earthquake and tsunami, which was so powerful it shifted the entire country. A magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck off the coast of Honshu, Japan’s largest island, in April.

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe