What defines a galaxy?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Thomas S. Statler, associate professor of physics and astronomy at Ohio University, explains.

A century ago astronomers talked about only one galaxy, what they called the "Stellar System" or the Milky Way. The term "galaxy" was used almost synonymously with "universe," and when a distinction was drawn, the issue was mainly whether or not the universe had an extent beyond that of the stars. Twenty-five years later our galaxy was established as one of many and the study of what Edwin Hubble had first dubbed extragalactic nebulae was burgeoning. Astronomers had analyzed the light of other galaxies spectroscopically and determined that it was starlight. We still take this as one of the defining characteristics of a galaxy: its visible light comes primarily from stars. Today we are nearly overwhelmed with data on the immense diversity of galaxies, to the extent that it actually becomes difficult to write down a definition that distinguishes what is a galaxy from everything that is not.

Basically, galaxies are the fundamental units of structure in the universe where stars form. Theory currently holds that all galaxies are confined by the gravity of the dark matter halos that permeate and surround them, but there is recent evidence that some galaxies may be dark-matter-free. It is also tempting to say that galaxies are where most of the ordinary matter in the universe resides, but recent x-ray observations have shown that there is actually more matter in the diffuse intergalactic gas than in the galaxies themselves.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is slightly easier to define what doesn't constitute a galaxy. Any object that can exist as a distinct unit inside a galaxy isn't a galaxy, which excludes the globular star clusters from galaxyhood. Dwarf galaxies are more luminous (typically by a factor of 100) than globular clusters and are not as dense. The distinction between dwarf and normal galaxies is mostly, but not entirely, one of size: dwarfs generally don't come brighter than a few billion solar luminosities (a few percent of that of the Milky Way). Qualifying a type of galaxy is also an issue of environment. A small galaxy may be dubbed a satellite if it is orbiting a larger system, but merely called a field galaxy if is not linked to a bigger galaxy. Satellites are often ingested by their larger cousins, and when this happens, the smaller galaxy loses its identity. This is the likely fate of many of the dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way, including the Sagittarius dwarf and the two Magellanic Clouds. The larger of these clouds, however, technically isn't a dwarf at all but a "Magellanic Irregular," which tells you how arbitrary it is to put human labels on cosmic objects.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe