New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What the Fish Saw: How Swimming Fish Maintain Orderly Schools

Researchers are unlocking the secrets of how fish swim in coordinated schools

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The minnows known as golden shiners put on displays of synchronized swimming that could impress even the toughest Olympic judge. The ability of shiners and other fishes to change direction in harmony has long intrigued scientists, who have developed several ways of describing in mathematical terms how schooling works. But those approaches tend to be simplifications that do not take into account all the real-time sensory information available to the fish.

To get a better idea of what the fish were actually doing, Princeton University biologist Iain Couzin and his colleagues devised a way to make golden shiners move en masse and on cue. The researchers taught a few fish to swim toward a green light to find food and then placed those fish in a larger school. When the light went on, the trained fish broke toward it, triggering a cascade of responses as the rest of the school fell in behind the leaders.

Couzin and his colleagues filmed the action with high-speed video that allowed the researchers to map each fish's visual field using the location and position of its head. The researchers reported in Current Biology that each fish based its decisions on where to go not on the behavior of its nearest neighbors, as is often assumed, but on a synthesis of where all the fish in its field of view were headed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We could pinpoint the exact moment that a fish started moving toward the light, and we found the fish were responding to the fraction of individuals they could see that had also started moving,” Couzin says.

Meanwhile other researchers are working to uncover what makes some fish school in the first place. Katie Peichel, a biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, and her colleagues have found that schooling in three-spined sticklebacks depends on behaviors linked to at least two distinct groups of genes. Her group reported in Current Biology that one cluster of genes controls a fish's propensity to join others in a large group; another set of genes influences how well a fish swims in formation, parallel to its neighbors.

Together the behavioral traits and sensory abilities of schooling fish produce dazzling maneuvers that help fish avoid or defend against predators. “By grouping together, they're sensing the world in a different way,” Couzin says.

Carrie Arnold is an independent public health journalist in Virginia.

More by Carrie Arnold
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Follow the Leader” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1213-26a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe