New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA’s Artemis II moon mission prepares for a host of science observations

The Artemis II crew will spend about six hours observing the moon on Monday. Here’s what they’ll be looking for

A detailed view of the full disk of the illuminated near side of the moon.

The near side of the moon, as seen in Clementine spacecraft data from 1994.

NASA

NASA has launched four astronauts on a pioneering journey around the moon—the Artemis II mission. Follow our coverage here.

The four crew members onboard NASA’s Artemis II mission will soon become the first humans to ever see a swath of the far side of the moon while it’s illuminated—and scientists have tasked them with lots of reconnaissance work to do.

NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen will conduct the bulk of that work during a six-hour window on April 6 as their Orion capsule loops around the far side of the moon.

Then the astronauts will be consulting a detailed wish list from scientists who scouted out targets along their path for them to observe. These scientists have plenty of detailed observations of the moon from satellites and the Apollo missions, but the Artemis II crew will be the first people to see our natural satellite up close since 1972—and that matters.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The human eye is the most nuanced detector there is, especially when connected to a well-trained human brain,” says Kelsey Young, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and lunar science lead for the Artemis II mission.

A key feature that scientists want the astronauts to notice is the color and brightness of the lunar surface. “A common misconception is the moon is black and white,” Young says. “But when astronauts have a chance to let their eyes become accustomed to what they’re seeing, they can detect subtle color nuances.”

Apollo astronauts emphasized this in their reports back home—the late Apollo 12 astronaut Alan Bean even became a painter after his flight, with his art displaying the colorful lunar surface. And during Apollo 17, geologist and astronaut Harrison Schmitt famously noticed a patch of orange dust that, later analyses revealed, told a story about volcanic activity on the moon that scientists hadn’t expected.

An animation focuses on a recctangular map of the entire surface of the moon, with an irregular brighter shape indicating the less than half of the terrain that astronauts have seen directly.

A global map of the lunar surface comparing the portions astronauts have seen before and those they haven't.

NASA Goddard/SVS

“Color is really important for us,” Young says. “Color traces back to formation process and evolution, so it tells us something about geological processes and how recently they were active at the moon.”

Although some Apollo astronauts orbited the moon much closer to the surface than the Artemis II crew will be when they pass it, their greater distance—about 4,000 miles (6,000 kilometers) above the moon—will offer a different perspective and could provide more context for their observations, Young says. During the flyby, about 20 percent of the moon’s far side will be sunlit.

Before Artemis II even launched, the crew memorized 15 distinctive features on the moon to help them stay oriented throughout the flight. One of those is of particular scientific interest, Young says: the Orientale Basin. This massive impact crater is located along the edge of the moon, where the near and far sides meet, as seen from Earth.

Scientists believe the Orientale Basin formed about 3.8 billion years ago, after a 40-mile-wide impactor slammed into the moon. The massive amounts of debris that impact created then crashed back to the lunar surface, creating a tidal wave that was 11 times taller than Mount Everest and then sloshing around for two hours to form the outer two of the basin’s three concentric rims. The innermost rim formed later, when a mountain at the crater’s center collapsed.

A gray landscape with a dark spot ringed by three walls in the center.

A view of Orientale Basin created by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University

Orientale is a scientific archetype, offering clues to similar impacts on even more distant worlds, Young says. But “Apollo crews never saw it,” she says. The Artemis II astronauts will be the first humans to observe the famous crater directly.

A second feature that the crew will see for the first time is the far side’s Ohm Crater, a relatively new impact site with particularly bright rays—the term scientists use for the lines that splay out from a crater. A third, the Pierazzo Crater, is located within the debris that was released by the Orientale impact and sports dark lines of lunar rock that had melted, flowed and then froze. Another crater in the planned observations—which could only be finalized after Artemis II launched last Wednesday—will be Glushko Crater, a large young crater located near the edge of the moon.

Throughout the observing period, the astronauts will also be keeping their eyes peeled for impact flashes. These flashes are caused when debris slams into the moon in real time, as it has for billions of years.

As part of their mission training, the Artemis II astronauts learned how to communicate what they observe with such precision and detail that scientists will be able to see the moon through their eyes. In addition, scientists have prepared specific prompts that crew members can reference when they observe each target to guide the report they will provide.

In the foreground, a sign read SCIENCE; in the background, a woman sits at a desk in Mission Control.

Artemis II science officer Kelsey Young at the science console in Mission Control.

NASA/Bill Stafford

The astronauts have already begun providing initial descriptions from more than 100,000 miles (160,000 kilometers) away, Young says—but she knows the best is yet to come. She isn’t alone—during the flyby, scientists will fill at least two “back rooms” at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Texas, where they will be on standby for any support needed during the operation. Meanwhile Young will be posted at a desk in Mission Control: the science console, a new addition to the room since the Apollo era.

“I am excited for the moon to feel a lot closer on Monday than it does right now,” Young says. “I cannot wait.”

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe