New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

What's That Robot Looking At?

Babies will follow the gaze of social robots just as they do with people

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Starting at 12 months old, infants follow the gaze of others—an instinctive behavior that allows them to learn from observation. But will they track just anyone’s eyes? In a recent study published in Neural Networks, University of Washington psychologist Andrew Meltzoff tested whether infants would fol­low the gaze of a humanoid robot. One group of 18-month-olds observed an experimenter play a mimicry game with a mobile robot, whereas another group of babies got to know the same robot as it remained completely stationary. Thirteen of the 16 babies who observed human-robot interaction later followed the robot’s gaze as it turned toward a toy, compared with only three of the 16 babies who observed no robot playtime. Infants, it seems, are highly attuned to social information, which they use to constantly update their perception of others—even to change a hunk of metal into a thinking being.

Ferris Jabr is a contributing writer for Scientific American. He has also written for the New York Times Magazine, the New Yorker and Outside.

More by Ferris Jabr
SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 6This article was published with the title “What's That Robot Looking At?” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 6 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0111-9b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe