New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why Do Wild Cats Have So Many Different Eye Colors?

The Internet’s vast cat resources help researchers chart cat eye evolution

Close up of a snow leopard eye

Snow leopard's colorful eye.

Picture by Tambako the Jaguar/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Wild cats showcase a stunning diversity of eye colors, proving a mystery for researchers because most wild species are known to have narrow eye color schemes (usually black, brown or yellow). Eye color’s evolution is notoriously hard to track: fossils don’t preserve it, taxidermy specimens have fabricated eyes, and most books illustrate only one example per species. Now scientists have harnessed the Internet’s abundant wild cat photographs to chart the transition from brown eyes to colors such as green and blue—and found something of a gray area.

Any animal’s eye color is determined by its levels of two melanin pigments: eumelanin, which makes brown-black, and pheomelanin, which makes red-yellow. Eye colors vary according to the amounts of each, with different combinations leading to colors such as blue, green and gray.

For a paper in iScience, Harvard University biology graduate student Julius Tabin and his co-author, Katherine Chiasson, used a process called ancestral state reconstruction to determine the eye colors of extinct wild cat species based on those of their living descendants. The authors analyzed the clearest images submitted to the database iNaturalist.org, then classified each cat’s eye color and mapped the data to the cat family tree, using an algorithm to find each common ancestor’s possible eye colors. The algorithm accounted for the likelihood of certain changes and figured in the time since species diverged in order to generate the likeliest colors at every split.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“It’s a way we can actually look into the eyes of the felid ancestor,” Tabin says. “The ancestor develops gray eyes, and then the eye color diversity just explodes.” Once an eye with moderate amounts of both eumelanin and pheomelanin appeared (producing gray eyes), blue and green were not far behind.

The scientists next tried to connect the discovered eye colors with numerous factors, including habitat, fur color and hunting behavior, to help explain why those shades had evolved. But they found little correlation. “Huskies have those bright blue eyes because we wanted them to” and bred them accordingly, Tabin says, but in wild cats, “I have no idea what’s going on here.” Sexual selection is plausible—perhaps cats prefer particular eye colors in mates—but it would be challenging to test.

Eye color is “a very overlooked trait, and it’s a pity because it’s probably important ecologically and evolutionarily,” says University of Glasgow evolutionary biologist Arianna Passarotto, who is not affiliated with the new study. She is skeptical of using photos taken in uncontrolled conditions, but she describes the study as “ambitious” and “absolutely very novel.”

As Juan José Negro, an ecologist at the Spanish National Research Council also not affiliated with the study, puts it, “the eye is the last frontier for [studying] coloration.”

Zane Wolf was formerly a graphics intern at Scientific American. She has an interdisciplinary research background, including animal behavior, soft robotics and astrophysics, with a current focus on data storytelling as it pertains to scientific communication.

More by Zane Wolf
Scientific American Magazine Vol 332 Issue 3This article was published with the title “In a Cat’s Eye” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 332 No. 3 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032025-7GpSGdcWSKYvrDrYnKwGxA

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe