New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why Don't Deer Crash into One Another When Startled?

The ruminants seem to head due north or south when fleeing, a new study shows

FABRIZIO MOGLIA Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When something frightens grazing deer, they all suddenly bound away together in an apparently organized fashion. How does a stressed-out, possibly panicked group of animals manage to coordinate such a getaway without crashing into one another?

In an effort to find out, biologist Hynek Burda of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague and his team turned to roe deer, European ungulates that often graze in open fields. As a favorite of hunters, the deer associate humans with danger and run away when approached. During the spring and summer of 2014 the researchers deliberately startled 188 groups of grazing deer in three different Czech hunting grounds.

It is reasonable to assume that the deer would run directly away from an approaching threat or toward the nearest cover. Instead the researchers discovered that the animals preferred heading toward magnetic north or south.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To Burda, this observation suggests that roe deer might be able to detect the earth's magnetic field, as if they have an innate compass. “Magnetoreception is apparently a less exotic sense than usually assumed,” he says. It may allow individuals in the herd to escape without colliding (because they head in the same direction), as well as to rapidly reassemble as a group once the threat has passed. The findings were published in August in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

Matthew Kauffman, a zoologist at the University of Wyoming who was not involved in the study, says the results are intriguing because researchers seldom consider geomagnetism as a strategy to avoid predators. But he adds that more evidence is needed to confirm the explanation and that Burda and his group should repeat the experiment in different places during different seasons. “Lots of things in the natural environment could correlate with the cardinal directions,” Kauffman says.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Taking Direction from a Deer” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 4 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1016-23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe