New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why the "Venus Rainbow" Is Actually a Glory

The first sighting of the light spectacle on another planet reveals properties of the mysterious Venusian clouds

If you look out of the window of an aeroplane and see its shadow on the cloud tops, you might be lucky enough to also see a 'glory': a bull’s-eye pattern resembling a small, circular, pastel-colored rainbow surrounding the shadow. The European Space Agency’s Venus Express space probe has now taken the first picture of the same phenomenon on another planet. The image was captured on 24 July 2011 and released this week. Nature explores how glories occur, how they differ from rainbows, and what this discovery means.

What causes a glory?
Like a rainbow, a glory is essentially a highly distorted image of the Sun reflected off water droplets or other aerosols in the atmosphere. The way it is formed, however, differs in important details from the prism effect that produces the wider arc of a rainbow, and the physics is surprisingly subtle. Optical theorists' attempts to fully understand how glories work were unsuccessful until the 1980s, when physicist Moysés Nussenzveig at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil showed that the main cause is a process known as wave tunneling. This is caused when rays of sunlight reflected by a droplet do not actually enter the droplet — as in the case of rainbows — but merely pass near it. They nonetheless stir up electromagnetic waves within the droplet. Those waves rattle around inside the droplet and eventually tunnel back out, sending light rays back in the direction from which they came. The way waves resonate within the droplet is wavelength-dependent, thus splitting white light into the spectrum of colors.

When can you see a glory?
To see a glory, you have stand with your back to the Sun, so that the reflected rays return along your line of sight. A good viewing site, apart from an aeroplane window, is a mountain peak that rises above clouds or fog (see picture). The bull’s-eye pattern will surround the shadow cast by your head — giving you the appearance of a saint in Christian iconography. In fact, admirers of the phenomenon speculate that all those halos you see around saints’ and mystics’ heads are really depictions of atmospheric glories. Samuel Taylor Coleridge described the aura in the poem “Constancy to an Ideal Object.” Because of the precise visual alignment required, each person will see the glory around his or her own head, but not around anyone else’s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What have scientists now observed?
Venus Express, which has been orbiting Earth's sister planet since 2006, observed glories in April and July 2011. When the orbiter had the Sun behind it, it looked straight down at the Venusian clouds and saw the characteristic bull’s-eye pattern, about 1,200 kilometers across. Wojciech Markiewicz at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Göttingen, Germany, and his colleagues report the discovery in a forthcoming paper in Icarus. Although the Pioneer Venus mission of the late 1970s and 80s observed cloudbows, which are yet another type of phenomenon, this is the first sighting of a full extraterrestrial glory.

Does the discovery serve some broader purpose, or is it just a pretty sight?
The glory is a sensitive marker for conditions in the Venusian clouds, which, made of sulphuric acid and completely enveloping the planet, have long held a special fascination for planetary scientists. The clouds contribute to the runaway greenhouse effect that makes the planet so hellish. Some substance in the clouds accounts for half of the solar energy absorbed by Venus and gives the planet its yellowish color. Yet researchers do not know what that substance is.

The mere fact that a glory can form at all suggests that the cloud droplets are spherical in shape and uniform in size. The position of the concentric rings indicates that the droplets are 1.2 micrometers in diameter, and the relative brightness of different rings indicates that the refractive index of the droplet fluid exceeds that of sulphuric acid, according to Markiewicz's team. The simulated image at left shows how the smaller particle size in Venusian cloud tops (compared to a typical 10 to 40 micrometers in terrestrial ones) causes the colored fringes to spread further apart than they would appear on Earth. Markiewicz and his co-authors suggest that the droplets either have a core of iron chloride or an outer coating of elemental sulphur. Both substances were suggested in the early 1980s as candidates for the mysterious absorber, and both are interesting for the broader story of the planet. Sulphur is tied up with volcanism and greenhouse warming; iron chloride poses the problem of what would have launched iron compounds 70 kilometers up into the sky.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on March 14, 2014.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe