New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Women Still Face Retaliation for Reporting Sexual Harassment at Work

People are less likely to recommend a woman for promotion if she has self-reported being sexually harassed, a study finds

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Despite the gains of the #MeToo movement, women still hesitate to file work-related sexual harassment complaints for fear of repercussions. Now a study suggests people may indeed penalize female employees for self-reporting such experiences.

Chloe Grace Hart, a doctoral candidate in sociology at Stanford University, ran an experiment five times between late 2017 and early 2018, each time involving about 200 people who identified as male, female or another gender. Hart asked participants to imagine they were the manager of a company considering a fictional female sales associate, named Sarah, for promotion. Each participant was assigned to one of five groups. Four groups received an employee file that contained information about harassment—either sexual or nonsexual—that Sarah had experienced from a male co-worker. Each incident was either self-reported or reported by a colleague. A fifth group received the same file without any record of harassment.

Hart then asked the participants to rate how inclined they were to recommend Sarah for promotion on a scale from 1 (“extremely unlikely”) to 7 (“extremely likely”). Hart found that on average participants were 0.37 points less likely to recommend Sarah for promotion if she self-reported her sexual harassment than if her colleague reported it. They were also 0.16 points less likely to recommend her than if she self-reported nonsexual harassment. Finally, the participants were 0.11 points less likely to recommend her than if her employment file made no mention of any harassment. The study was published online in May in Gender & Society.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It serves as a reminder that barriers to reporting sexual harassment “have not gone away,” says Nancy Hauserman, professor emeritus of management and entrepreneurship at the University of Iowa, who was not involved in the study. “I think it is important to keep sexual harassment in the scholarly gaze.”

The findings are bolstered by a 2018 report that analyzed 46,210 Title VII sexual harassment discrimination charges filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and state Fair Employment Practices Agencies. The report found that 65 percent of women who filed such charges between 2012 and 2016 said they lost their jobs after making their complaints.

But Hart's research did find a silver lining. The participants in her most recent study group were significantly more likely to promote Sarah when she self-reported sexual harassment as compared with those in the earliest group—which may be linked to the momentum of the #MeToo movement, Hart says. “I don't think that the study indicates that the problem is solved,” she says. “But if nothing else, it indicates that we are able to shift our social perceptions of people in a position of experiencing sexual harassment.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 321 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Price of Speaking Up” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 321 No. 2 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0819-18a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe