New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Oldest RNA in the World Extracted from Frozen Woolly Mammoth

RNA has been extracted from an ancient woolly mammoth, providing insight into its last moments on Earth

The yellowish form of a mummified baby mammoth, with tufts of red fur visible on its legs and its trunk pointed upward is light up in a display case with people taking photos in the background

The frozen carcass of Yuka is displayed at an exhibition in Yokohama, Japan, on July 12, 2013.

KAZUHIRO NOGI/AFP via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 2010 Yukaghir hunters found the nearly intact carcass of a young woolly mammoth frozen in the northern Siberian permafrost. With its reddish-brown fur still clinging to its skin, the dog-sized calf was named Yuka Radiocarbon dating placed it at roughly 40,000 years old. Now a team of researchers has extracted from Yuka the oldest RNA molecules ever recovered, revealing traces of gene activity that survived the last ice age.

“This is a snapshot of the last minutes or hours of Yuka’s life,” says University of Copenhagen genomicist Emilio Mármol-Sánchez, lead author of a study on the discovery, which was published today in Cell.

Unlike DNA, RNA records which genes were active in a cell before an organism died. Extracting it is extremely difficult because the molecule is chemically unstable and rapidly destroyed by enzymes and environmental changes after death. Even RNA from living organisms, Mármol-Sánchez notes, degrades within minutes if it is not preserved. Yet obtaining it is crucial to reconstructing how extinct animals grew, adapted to their environments or responded to disease and stress.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The oldest RNA ever reported until now came from a 14,300-year-old “wolf” puppy frozen in permafrost. But when Mármol-Sánchez received a box containing fragments of muscle and skin from 10 woolly mammoths, including Yuka, he suspected he could go even further back.

The reddish brown first and dark brown mummified skin of a mammoth against white paper set on top of grass with a measuring tape next to it

The skin and ear from part of the skull of a woolly mammoth that yielded ancient RNA. The skin was discovered in 2018 in Belaya Gora, near the Indigirka River in Siberia.

Love Dalén

After extracting both DNA and RNA in ultraclean laboratories, the researchers compared several computational tools to ensure that the sequences they recovered truly came from mammoths rather than from modern bacteria or modern contamination. The fragments were then mapped against the genomes of modern Asian elephants and the previously reconstructed woolly mammoth genome to identify which genes the RNA originated from.

In Yuka’s tissue, the team identified hundreds of messenger RNAs—molecules that control which proteins cells make—and noncoding RNAs, which have other functions. Many of the most abundant ones came from genes involved in muscle contraction and energy metabolism. These results open the door to new biological information that will allow scientists to study, for example, stress in the muscles of these ancient animals, Mármol-Sánchez says.

The researchers also detected ancient muscle-related microRNAs as well as two previously unknown microRNAs that were and are unique to mammoths and elephants. The RNA sequences also showed that Yuka carried Y-chromosome genes, meaning the calf wasn’t female, as previously thought, but male.

Oliver Smith, who helped discover the previous record-holding “wolf” RNA in his work as a forensic archaeologist, says the new findings show that “the potential for looking at RNA viruses in permafrost situations is entirely viable.” Beyond offering valuable insights into mammoth biology, ancient RNA can also help scientists study other long-lost organisms, including ancient coronaviruses or influenza strains, adds Smith, who was not involved in the new study . This is important because it helps scientists understand which viruses might remain viable over geological timescales, as well as the risks of reintroducing infections into modern ecosystems and the gaps in their understanding of how such events could translate into real health threats.

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe