On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The human brain is still a work in progress, according to scientists who have identified two rather new variants of genes that help to govern the organ’s size. A version of one gene, ASPM, emerged on the evolutionary scene only 6,000 years ago. The other, microcephalin, arose 37,000 years ago. Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Bruce T. Lahn (left) and his colleagues at the University of Chicago, who unearthed the genes, say they provide evidence that the brain is continually adapting and that there is no telling what it might look like in the far future. “We tend to think that we have reached the pinnacle of evolution,” Lahn says. But these findings show that “the human brain is still changing—and rather rapidly.”
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
