A War of Poison Gas, 1915

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: May 15, 1915

As the Great War ground down to a deadlock, both sides sought some method of gaining an advantage. The Germans (taking a cue from the French) first used poison gas on a wide scale on April 22, 1915, in the trenches near Ypres, Belgium, against French colonial troops. Over 160 tons of chlorine gas were released from almost 6,000 cylinders. The French troops were completely unprotected against gas; they lost over 1,000 men killed, and the rest broke and ran. Luckily for the Allies, the Germans did not expect such a dramatic result and were not prepared to exploit such success.

At this point in the war, the Allies did not know what kind of poison gas they were facing, nor how it was delivered. The cover image [see illustration] is a best-guess interpretation of the technology involved. The cylinders we now know were about five feet tall and weighed about 190 pounds full. The protection that the Germans are shown wearing are the chemical-soaked pads used back then by workers at risk from chlorine gas in industry, and respirator helmets used by fire departments for entering smoke-filled buildings. In reality most of the German troops were apparently as well equipped as their Allied foes: they had no protection at all.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Respirator from 1915 as used by civilian
firemen. Respirators such as this one
served as models for later military gas
masks. Image: Scientific American,
March 27, 1915

“The reports which have been received seem to show that the gas so far used is chlorine. The greenish yellow color, the strong smell, the great density of the gas causing it to flow along the ground are indications of chlorine. The symptoms shown by its victims are those exhibited by persons who have been poisoned by chlorine in industrial accidents ; that is great irritation of the mucous membranes, bronchitis, and sudden death by a narcotic action in the most severe cases.”
“If chlorine is the gas which was used, it must have reached the trenches in a concentrated form to cause death unless the death was due in part to psychological effects, for to produce death rapidly it is necessary that the air breathed shall contain at least one part of chlorine in 1,000 of air. Long exposure to air containing 1 part of chlorine per 100,000 is dangerous and even smaller amounts are troublesome.”

The Allies started working on countermeasures for chlorine gas immediately.

Ironic note: in the same issue of May 15, 1915, there is an article about the dangers from the lead and sulfuric acid storage batteries aboard U.S. submarines, used for driving electric motors while submerged: “On the United States submarine ‘E-2’ in the autumn of 1914 while at sea on her way from Newport News to New York, the escaping chlorine fumes seriously affected the crew despite prompt measures for their relief.”

-

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914–1918 on the chemical aspects of the war. It is available for purchase at www.scientificamerican.com/products/world-war-i/

Dan Schlenoff was a contributing editor at Scientific American and edited the 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column for one seventh of the magazine's history.

More by Dan Schlenoff

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe