Cloak of Invisibility, 1915

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: December 18, 1915

The word “camouflage” entered the English language, from the French, in 1917. Before then, some terms used were “concealment,” “deception” or “artifice.” Here are three examples of concealment, on the sea, in the sky and on land, from 100 years ago.

The “the transparent battleplane” devised by the Frensh air force was a service airplane with wings covered by a newly-devised transparent material called “cellon.” It was a great idea, but the material quickly lost its transparency and strength, and was soon abandoned. In 2015 we “see” with radar, far beyond the limits of human sight, so aircraft such as the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk are designed to be virtually invisible to radar.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cloaked ship: the U.S.S. Erickson lays a smokescreen during naval exercises , 1915.
Image: Scientific American Supplement, December 18, 1915

During naval exercises, the destroyer U.S.S. Erickson shows off its ability to produce a smokescreen. Here are some uses for such a screen:

“The large cover picture illustrates an interesting artifice sometimes resorted to in naval engagements .... Most of our torpedo boat destroyers use oil for fuel, and if the combustion of the oil in the boiler furnaces is not perfect a dense smoke results. Advantage is taken of this fact under certain circumstances by sending one or more destroyers to run to windward of the enemy’s fleet, and as near as possible, with the combustion in their furnaces so adjusted as to produce the densest smoke .... Under cover of this smoke curtain the larger fighting vessels of the fieet are able to gain positions of advantage with much less danger of being hit than if they advanced in the open. The same maneuver is also of advantage in case of a retreat.”

 

The shortage of horses necessitated the use of animals that would otherwise be unacceptable for use by German cavalry (“Uhlans”). The description reads:

“Uhlans dyeing a white horse, so that he may blend better with the landscape and meet the military requirements that nature fails to observe. Army horses are also painted white to blend with the snow.”

Dying a white horse to blend in with the landscape. 
Image: Scientific American, February 6, 1915

-

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914–1918 on innovations during the First World War. It is available for purchase at www.scientificamerican.com/products/world-war-i/

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe