Heavy Guns Blast Trenches, 1915

Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: April 17, 1915. High technology blasted a way through fortified lines in the First World War.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor’s note (4/2/2017): This week marks the 100-year anniversary of the U.S. entry into the First World War. Scientific American, founded in 1845, spent the war years covering the monumental innovations that changed the course of history, from the first tanks and aerial combat to the first widespread attacks with chemical weapons. To mark the centennial, we are republishing the article below and many others. For full access to our archival coverage of the Great War sign up for an All Access subscription today.

Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: April 17, 1915

Two Austrians with a 305-millimeter shell for a siege howitzer (the propellant was loaded separately). Image: Scientific American, April 17, 1915


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


World War I was an artillery war. In the opening days, the German army used a new variety of siege gun to blast holes in the Belgian and French forts that had been designed and built–decades earlier–to bar passage. These new guns fired a large caliber shell but were movable by road, so they could keep up with the front lines of the army. One model of siege howitzer was on loan from Germany’s allies, the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The Model 1911 305-millimeter guns were made by the Skoda Works in the Kingdom of Bohemia, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The guns were fearfully effective for their designed task. One example: On August 8, 1914, one 305-millimeter Skoda howitzer had been trained on the Belgian Fort Barchon. By that afternoon, the fort surrendered. Within a year, military tactics had been obliged to evolve to rely less on large, immobile forts and instead were based on extensive field fortifications: networks of trenches, dugouts and earthworks hugging the ground, well-camouflaged and protected by dense thickets of barbed wire. By the time this issue of Scientific American had been published, the opportunity for one howitzer to win a battle had come and gone, and until the end of the war, the value of artillery lay in the industrial-scale quantities of shells it could deliver on target.

Austrian troops with the 305-millimeter Skoda howitzer. Effective range was over 5 miles. You can see a cart carrying a shell at the left of the image. Image: Scientific American Supplement, April 17, 1915

The image on the cover of the April 17 issue shows two soldiers in Austrian uniforms hauling a giant shell for the 305-millimeter Skoda howitzer, either the 630-pound high explosive for use against earthworks or the 850-pound armor-piercing version for use against forts (the propellant was loaded separately). The men look neither victorious nor defeated, merely tired–two small cogs in the industrial warfare that had engulfed Europe and was spreading still farther.

You can see French fortifications smashed by German heavy artillery–including Skoda 305 millimeter cannons of this kind–here.

An image from Scientific American of a 420-millimeter howitzer being made at the Krupp works in Germany is here.

-

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914-1918 on artillery. It is available for purchase at www.ScientificAmerican.com/wwi

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe