Needs of the New War: Fresh Aviators and Novel Tactics

Reported in Scientific American: This Week in World War I: September 19, 1914 The first few weeks of the Great War in Europe had convincingly shown the value of aircraft for reconnaissance work.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American: This Week in World War I: September 19, 1914

airmen training

Instructors talking to pilots at a British pilot-training camp, 1914. The aircraft appears to be a French Farman MF11 biplane, which has a “pusher” type propeller. Credit: Scientific American, September 19, 1914

The first few weeks of the Great War in Europe had convincingly shown the value of aircraft for reconnaissance work. The technology was brand new: workable airplanes were an invention less than ten years old. Armies scrambled to set up a steady supply of airplanes from manufacturers and trained pilots to fly them. The military also had to figure out how to best use and maintain their air army.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The work of the Concentration Camp* at Netheravon in England opened on June 2nd with a conference of all officers, at which the commanding officer explained briefly the objects of the camp, viz.: to test in various ways the degree of training of the ‘personnel’ both on the ground and in the air, the work and handling of aircraft and transports and experiments of numerous sorts. There was also the study and co-ordination by means of lectures, discussions, conferences, and specially detailed committee, of the innumerable problems, such as mobilization, technical and military training, observation, including observation of artillery fire, workshops, stores, meteorology, wireless telegraphy, photography, bomb-dropping, and organization of all kinds, which are essential to the building up of an air service for military purposes on a firm and efficient basis. Although seventy machines were available, it was obvious that flying and the carrying out of tests with aircraft was only one phase of the instruction carried out, as will be seen from the brief notes of the work accomplished, and it will be readily understood that the results of tests could not in many cases be made public, for reasons of military expediency.”

*The term “concentration camp” is used in the older sense of a camp where personnel and resources are gathered together-Ed.

To see a full archive of our coverage of World War I—military, economic, social, technological—view our archive package, Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, at www.ScientificAmerican.com/wwi.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe