September 15, 2011

Editor's Selections: The Elusivity of the Female Orgasm, Anti-aging, and Meaning

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

This week on ResearchBlogging.org:

The female orgasm apparently mystifies a fair number of people—men and scientists alike (though those two groups may not be wholly unrelated). Greg Laden explores the evolutionary biology of orgasms in humans in response to a paper that investigates the genetic origins of the female orgasm. He delivers an excellent discussion on the ways changes to social groups may have driven the development of the orgasm, including its function in maintaining relationships.
From orgasms to vanity: staying the aging process is also something that has held fascination for many (e.g., Ponce de Leon). At Inkfish, Elizabeth Preston discusses research on senescence (aging&38212;the weakening we experience as we get older). Science is trying to understand why some species do not experience this phenomenon, and if they can crack it, it could change the meaning of "successful aging."
To round out these discussions, David Winter muses on the meaning of "meaningful," as he shares research on the reasons some activities are more meaningful than others—including work.

Tune in next Thursday for more from anthropology, philosophy, and research on ResearchBlogging.org.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American