Last #NYCSciTweetUp for 2011: December 1st

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


What an amazing year it's been—particularly in terms of how much the New York SciCom community has grown! It's been quite a journey and the #NYCSciTweetUps received a bit of press recently from the International Business Times. I'm excited that the event has garnered this kind of press and I hope that it will continue to grow in 2012 and attract the diverse membership that it has.

That said, the #NYCSciTweetUp wouldn't be what it is without the support of some amazing people and programs here in New York City:

  • Bora Zivkovic and Lou Woodley, who planted the seeds of the idea and who widely promote and support the TweetUps from afar.

  • Virginia Hughes and Dan Vorhaus, who helped plan and administer the TweetUps in their early stages.

  • The Story Collider and Science Online NYC (SoNYC), the "sister-type" science events here in New York City, that have always worked to endorse and encourage participation in the #NYCSciTweetUp.

  • And, of course, there are the attendees who always make time in their schedule to attend and try to bring new faces to the group.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thank you!

I hope that we can continue to develop this event in the spirit of collaboration in which it was born, and I hope to see it grow beyond the New York community—as it has already begun to do in Washington DC thanks to the efforts of Allie Wilkinson and Lou Woodley.

Our next #NYCSciTweetUp (and last for year) will be on Dec. 1 at 6:30 pm at the Peculier Pub. Details have been posted on the Facebook page (as they always are). And as per the norm, for more information, you can always:

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe